Assessing development in the pediatric office
- PMID: 15173463
Assessing development in the pediatric office
Abstract
Objective: To determine the proportion of children aged 10 to 35 months who were reported ever to have received a developmental assessment (DA) and to examine characteristics of the child, family, and health care setting associated with the receipt of a DA.
Methods: The National Survey of Early Childhood Health, conducted in 2000, is a survey of 2068 parents of children 4 to 35 months of age. Children were classified as having received a DA in response to 2 questions: whether the child's pediatric provider ever told parents that he or she was doing a "developmental assessment" and/or parents recalled explicit components of a DA, such as stacking blocks or throwing a ball. Parent-reported receipt of a DA was assessed in relationship to child and family, health care access, other measures of health care content and process, and measures of quality and satisfaction.
Results: Approximately 57% of children 10 to 35 months of age ever received a DA. Forty-two percent of parents recalled ever being told by their child's pediatric provider that a DA was being done. Thirty-nine percent recalled their child's being asked to perform specific tasks routinely included in a DA. Bivariate analysis indicates that receipt of a DA is not associated with child or family sociodemographic characteristics such as maternal education and household income, with the exception of race/ethnicity. Less acculturated Hispanic parents reported a DA more frequently than parents in other racial/ethnic groups (66% vs 56%). A smaller proportion of parents whose children who used community health centers reported their child's ever having received a DA compared with children who use other settings (51% vs 60%). Compared with other children, parents whose child ever received a DA reported more frequently than other parents that the time spent with the child's provider during the last well-child visit was adequate (94% vs 80%). They also reported longer visits (19 minutes vs 16 minutes), higher family-centered care ratings (mean: 71 vs 59), and higher satisfaction with well-child care (8.9 vs 8.4). Receipt of a DA is also associated with the content of developmentally focused anticipatory guidance received. For each health supervision topic analyzed, frequency of discussion is higher for children who ever received a DA. In multivariate analysis, odds of receiving a DA are higher for children with longer visits with the provider (odds ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.05) and lower for children in community health clinics compared with a private office (odds ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.96), even accounting for total well-child visits to the pediatric provider.
Conclusion: Although guidelines endorse the routine provision of DAs, parents of many children do not report receiving DAs. Children who receive assessments are more likely to receive other developmental services, and their parents are more likely to report greater satisfaction with care and rate the interpersonal quality of well-child care more favorably. The substantial number of children who do not receive these routinely recommended services raises important questions about the quality of care received.
Similar articles
-
Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood.Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1917-25. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15173462
-
Satisfaction with health care for young children.Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1965-72. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15173468
-
Parent report of reading to young children.Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1944-51. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15173465
-
Children with disabilities: a longitudinal study of child development and parent well-being.Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2001;66(3):i-viii, 1-114; discussion 115-26. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2001. PMID: 11677873 Review.
-
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Early Childhood and Adoption and Dependent Care. Developmental issues for young children in foster care.Pediatrics. 2000 Nov;106(5):1145-50. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 11061791 Review.
Cited by
-
Well-child care clinical practice redesign for serving low-income children.Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e229-39. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3775. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Pediatrics. 2014. PMID: 24936004 Free PMC article.
-
The Early Intervention Referral Process for Rural Infants and Toddlers with Delays or Disabilities: A Family Perspective.Matern Child Health J. 2021 May;25(5):715-723. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03067-2. Epub 2020 Nov 17. Matern Child Health J. 2021. PMID: 33201452 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical utility of the Structured Observation of Motor Performance in Infants within the child health services.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181398. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28723929 Free PMC article.
-
Well-Child Care Redesign: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Parent Experiences in the PARENT Trial.Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7):747-754. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 14. Acad Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28232142 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Parent Coach-Led Model of Well-Child Care for Young Children in Low-Income Communities: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 25;10(11):e27054. doi: 10.2196/27054. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. PMID: 34842563 Free PMC article.