Positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation: review of equipment and international survey of practice
- PMID: 15174776
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02981.x
Positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation: review of equipment and international survey of practice
Abstract
Background: The equipment used to provide positive pressure ventilation to newborns needing resuscitation at delivery varies between institutions. Devices were reviewed and their use surveyed in a sample of neonatal centres worldwide.
Aim: To determine which equipment is used to resuscitate newborns at delivery in a sample of teaching hospitals around the world.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent via e-mail to a neonatologist at each of 46 NICUs in 23 countries on five continents, asking which resuscitation equipment they used. If it was not returned, follow-up was by e-mail.
Results: Data were obtained from 40 (87%) centres representing 19 countries. Round face masks are used at 34 (85%) centres, anatomically shaped masks are used exclusively at six (15%) and a mixture of types are used at 11 (28%). Straight endotracheal tubes are used exclusively at 36 (90%) centres: shouldered tubes are used infrequently at three of the four centres that have them. The self-inflating bag is the most commonly used manual ventilation device (used at 33 (83%) centres), the Laerdal Infant Resuscitator the most popular model. Flow-inflating bags are used at 10 (25%) centres. The Neopuff Infant Resuscitator is used at 12 (30%) centres. Varying oxygen concentrations are provided during neonatal resuscitation at half of the centres, while 100% oxygen is routinely used at the other half.
Conclusions: This survey shows considerable variation in practice, reflecting this lack of evidence and consequent uncertainty among clinicians. Comparison of the two most popular manual ventilation devices, the Laerdal Infant Resuscitator and the Neopuff Infant Resuscitator, is urgently required.
Similar articles
-
Neonatal resuscitation: review of ventilation equipment and survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand.J Paediatr Child Health. 2004 Apr;40(4):208-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00339.x. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004. PMID: 15009551
-
A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices.Resuscitation. 2005 Oct;67(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.02.016. Resuscitation. 2005. PMID: 16081202
-
Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2001 Jun;49(3):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00311-2. Resuscitation. 2001. PMID: 11719125
-
Comparison of the T-piece resuscitator with other neonatal manual ventilation devices: a qualitative review.Resuscitation. 2012 Jul;83(7):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Jan 4. Resuscitation. 2012. PMID: 22227500 Review.
-
Newborn resuscitation devices: The known unknowns and the unknown unknowns.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;26(2):101233. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101233. Epub 2021 Mar 19. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021. PMID: 33773952 Review.
Cited by
-
Free-flow oxygen delivery to newly born infants.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Mar;92(2):F132-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.103077. Epub 2006 Nov 1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007. PMID: 17079252 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of a disposable compared to a non-disposable infant T-piece resuscitator.Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Aug;173(8):1005-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2280-z. Epub 2014 Feb 16. Eur J Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24531893
-
Reliability of Single-Use PEEP-Valves Attached to Self-Inflating Bags during Manual Ventilation of Neonates--An In Vitro Study.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0150224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150224. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26914209 Free PMC article.
-
Do we deliver the pressures we intend to when using a T-piece resuscitator?PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e64706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064706. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23717652 Free PMC article.
-
Positive end-expiratory pressure for resuscitation of newborn infants at birth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2003(4):CD004341. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004341.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15495102 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical