Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prophylaxis of vascular events: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- PMID: 15178495
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.014
Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prophylaxis of vascular events: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Clopidogrel is more effective than aspirin in preventing recurrent vascular events, but concerns about its cost-effectiveness have limited its use. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin as secondary prevention in patients with a prior myocardial infarction, a prior stroke, or peripheral arterial disease.
Methods: We constructed Markov models assuming a societal perspective, and based analyses on the lifetime treatment of a 63-year-old patient facing event probabilities derived from the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial as the base case. Outcome measures included costs, life expectancy in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and events averted.
Results: In patients with peripheral arterial disease, clopidogrel increased life expectancy by 0.55 QALYs at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $25,100 per QALY, as compared with aspirin. In poststroke patients, clopidogrel increased life expectancy by 0.17 QALYs at a cost of $31,200 per QALY. Aspirin was both less expensive and more effective than clopidogrel in post-myocardial infarction patients. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, our evaluation for patients with peripheral vascular disease was robust. Evaluations of stroke and myocardial infarction patients were sensitive predominantly to the cost and efficacy of clopidogrel, with aspirin therapy more effective and less expensive in 153 of 1000 simulations (15.3%) in poststroke patients and clopidogrel more effective in 119 of 1000 simulations (11.9%) in the myocardial infarction sample.
Conclusion: Clopidogrel provides a substantial increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy at a cost that is within traditional societal limits for patients with either peripheral arterial disease or a recent stroke. Current evidence does not support increased efficacy with clopidogrel relative to aspirin in patients following myocardial infarction.
Comment in
-
Aspirin or clopidogrel for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: is there a winner?Am J Med. 2004 Jun 15;116(12):850-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.008. Am J Med. 2004. PMID: 15178502 No abstract available.
-
How can modeling best contribute to the assessment of secondary stroke prevention strategies?Am J Med. 2005 Feb;118(2):198-9; author reply 199. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.08.026. Am J Med. 2005. PMID: 15694909 No abstract available.
-
Creative cost-effectiveness analysis of CAPRIE data- dust in our eyes.Am J Med. 2005 Feb;118(2):199-200; author reply 200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.11.013. Am J Med. 2005. PMID: 15694910 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Costs and consequences of clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prevention of ischaemic events in (high-risk) atherosclerotic patients in Sweden: a lifetime model based on the CAPRIE trial and high-risk CAPRIE subpopulations.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(4):251-65. doi: 10.2165/11535520-000000000-00000. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010. PMID: 20578780
-
Economic evaluation of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients without ST-segment elevation in Greece: a cost-utility analysis.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jul 1;10(4):261-71. doi: 10.2165/11633820-000000000-00000. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012. PMID: 22667992
-
Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom warfarin is unsuitable.Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):1020-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.034. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22221944
-
Prevention of secondary stroke and transient ischaemic attack with antiplatelet therapy: the role of the primary care physician [corrected].Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;61(10):1739-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01515.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2007. PMID: 17877660 Review.
-
Antithrombotic drugs for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.Ann Ital Med Int. 2000 Oct-Dec;15(4):282-90. Ann Ital Med Int. 2000. PMID: 11202630 Review.
Cited by
-
Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with recent ischemic stroke and established peripheral artery disease: an economic evaluation in a Chinese setting.Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Jun;35(6):365-74. doi: 10.1007/s40261-015-0290-x. Clin Drug Investig. 2015. PMID: 25985838
-
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014. Health Technol Assess. 2023. PMID: 37435838 Free PMC article.
-
Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e601S-e636S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2302. Chest. 2012. PMID: 22315273 Free PMC article.
-
Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e637S-e668S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2306. Chest. 2012. PMID: 22315274 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction amongst males with average cardiovascular risk in Iran.Res Pharm Sci. 2017 Apr;12(2):144-153. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.202453. Res Pharm Sci. 2017. PMID: 28515767 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical