HYDRA: possible determinants of unsatisfactory hypertension control in German primary care patients
- PMID: 15182110
- DOI: 10.1080/08037050310030982
HYDRA: possible determinants of unsatisfactory hypertension control in German primary care patients
Abstract
The Hypertension and Diabetes Screening and Awareness (HYDRA) study is a cross-sectional point-prevalence study performed in September 2001; 45,125 primary care attendees were recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices in Germany. Around 42% of all patients presenting in these practices had hypertension (WHO definition). In approximately 70% of these patients, hypertension was diagnosed by doctors and 84% of diagnosed patients were on antihypertensive medication, but in less than 30% of treated patients was blood pressure controlled (< 140/90 mmHg). The control rate in all patients presenting with hypertension (including those patients unrecognized) was as low as 19%. The present analysis aimed to find explanations for this unsatisfactory outcome of hypertension control. The main finding was that the rate of diagnosis of hypertension is alarmingly low in young people, probably due to insufficient blood pressure screenings. The data further indicated that doctors still set their target of treatment according to outdated guidelines and that doctors still orientate their treatment primarily with regard to the diastolic pressure. These insights into the causes of unsatisfactory hypertension control may help to direct future educational programmes designed to improve hypertension management specifically to these deficits and thereby to improve control rates.
Similar articles
-
High prevalence and poor control of hypertension in primary care: cross-sectional study.J Hypertens. 2004 Mar;22(3):479-86. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200403000-00009. J Hypertens. 2004. PMID: 15076152
-
Patterns of antihypertensive drug utilization in primary care.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;60(2):135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0731-6. Epub 2004 Mar 20. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15042351
-
Changes in the prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension in Germany? A clinical-epidemiological study of 50.000 primary care patients.PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052229. Epub 2012 Dec 28. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23284945 Free PMC article.
-
[Treatment of resistant hypertension].Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Apr 15;100(4):200-6; quiz 207-8. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1022-4. Med Klin (Munich). 2005. PMID: 15834529 Review. German. No abstract available.
-
Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:117-127. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_97. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 27722961 Review.
Cited by
-
Fixed-dose combinations as initial therapy for hypertension: a review of approved agents and a guide to patient selection.Drugs. 2009;69(13):1761-76. doi: 10.2165/11316710-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19719332 Review.
-
Undiagnosed hypertension among young adults with regular primary care use.J Hypertens. 2014 Jan;32(1):65-74. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000008. J Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 24126711 Free PMC article.
-
Missed opportunities in cardiovascular disease prevention?: low rates of hypertension recognition for women at medicine and obstetrics-gynecology clinics.Hypertension. 2011 Apr;57(4):717-22. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.168195. Epub 2011 Feb 21. Hypertension. 2011. PMID: 21339475 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the costs of care of hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome and its consequences, in Germany, Spain and Italy.Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):205-18. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0223-9. Epub 2010 Apr 20. Eur J Health Econ. 2011. PMID: 20405160
-
Moving beyond guidelines: are report cards the answer to high rates of uncontrolled hypertension?Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006 Aug;8(4):324-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-006-0072-1. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006. PMID: 16884664 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical