Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 May;34(5):254-60.
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.5.254.

Differences in back extensor strength between smokers and nonsmokers with and without low back pain

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in back extensor strength between smokers and nonsmokers with and without low back pain

Saud M Al-Obaidi et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 May.

Abstract

Study design: Cross-sectional study comparing isometric lumbar extensor strength (ILES) in individuals who smoke and nonsmokers with and without low back pain (LBP).

Objectives: To examine the differences in ILES between individuals who smoke and nonsmokers with and without LBP.

Background: Given the evidence for general muscle weakness in individuals who smoke and in individuals with LBP, we were interested in examining the interrelationships between back strength, in particular ILES, and LBP in individuals who smoke and nonsmokers.

Methods and measures: The study involved 76 men (age range, 30-50 years) in 4 groups, namely, nonsmokers with LBP (NS-LBP), a control group of nonsmokers without LBP (NS-C), smokers with LBP (S-LBP), and a control group of smokers without LBP (S-C). ILES was measured at 7 angles of lumbar flexion, specifically 72 degrees, 60 degrees, 48 degrees, 36 degrees, 24 degrees, 12 degrees, and 0 degrees. ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc comparison tests were used to analyze the data.

Results: Nonsmokers with LBP had less muscle strength than those without LBP (P<.01). However, the strength of smokers with and without LBP was comparable (P>.05). Both groups of individuals who did not smoke were stronger than the 2 groups comprised of smokers.

Conclusions: Individuals who smoke were weaker than those who did not smoke, but no difference in strength was noted between smokers with and without LBP. Although smoking appears to be an important cofactor in the etiology of LBP, the degree to which smoking is a primary, secondary, or a component of a combined etiology warrants further study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources