Simple and choice reaction time methods in the study of motor programming
- PMID: 15189802
- DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1979.10735177
Simple and choice reaction time methods in the study of motor programming
Abstract
In an extensive series of experiments Sternberg, Monsell, Knoll, and Wright (1978) reported that simple RT increased as a linear function of the number of items to be pronounced or typed. The present experiments replicate a portion of these results, but show that the effect is less general than may have been supposed. Since the effect does not occur in every case in which a response programming interpretation would predict it, this interpretation must be rejected. This conclusion is consistent with the viewpoint that response programming should be investigated in a choice- rather than simple-RT paradigm. In this view, motivated subjects can program responses in advance of the simple-RT interval because the particular response to be made has been precued. Effects of response parameters which are observed for motivated subjects in the simple-RT paradigm, such as those reported by Sternberg et al. (1978), should be attributed to processes other than programming motor responses.
Comment in
-
Methods in the study of motor programming: is it just a matter of simple vs. choice reaction time? A comment on Klapp et al. (1979).J Mot Behav. 1981 Dec;13(4):313-9. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1981.10735256. J Mot Behav. 1981. PMID: 15215077
Similar articles
-
Programming sequences of hand postures.J Mot Behav. 1987 Mar;19(1):77-95. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735401. J Mot Behav. 1987. PMID: 23944914
-
Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 May;13(2):193-203. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.2.193. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987. PMID: 2953850
-
Simple reaction time as a function of number and similarity of sequenced elements in rapid force production.Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Aug;85(1):307-20. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.307. Percept Mot Skills. 1997. PMID: 9293593
-
Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2005-21. doi: 10.1037/a0037522. Epub 2014 Jul 28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014. PMID: 25068697
-
Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments.Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Sep;60(3):256-67. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607449. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989. PMID: 2489852
Cited by
-
Neural encoding of choice during a delayed response task in primate striatum and orbitofrontal cortex.Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jun;236(6):1679-1688. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5253-z. Epub 2018 Apr 2. Exp Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 29610950
-
Routes to action in reaction time tasks.Psychol Res. 1986;48(3):169-77. doi: 10.1007/BF00309165. Psychol Res. 1986. PMID: 3823334 No abstract available.
-
Orthographic character complexity modulates dynamic neural activity in skilled handwriting.Br J Psychol. 2025 Feb;116(1):149-169. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12742. Epub 2024 Oct 5. Br J Psychol. 2025. PMID: 39367804 Free PMC article.
-
Using the self-select paradigm to delineate the nature of speech motor programming.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Jun;52(3):755-65. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0256). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 19474396 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources