Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords
- PMID: 15190715
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03196854
Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords
Abstract
The phonological similarity effect (PSE) was studied with lists of nonwords in one task of serial recall and one task of serial recognition. PSE was critically affected by the scoring procedure and the type of phonological similarity involved, and the effect diverged in several ways from the findings of previous studies on words. PSE was absent in serial recall, regardless of scoring procedure, when phonologically similar items that shared the midvowel were compared with phonologically distinct items. PSE was reversed when serial recall and item recall scores of rhyme items and consonant frame items were compared with distinct items, but it was present in the position accuracy score of rhyme lists. In serial recognition, PSE was absent when rhyme lists were compared with distinct lists. Recognition was better for consonant frame lists than for rhyme lists, and there was a marginally significant reversal of PSE when consonant frame lists were compared with distinct lists. In the view of Fallon, Groves, and Tehan's (1999) study and the present study, rhyming improves item recall and serial recall but diminishes position accuracy, regardless of lexicality. But consonant frame lists with differing midvowels have higher item recall, serial recall, and position accuracy scores than do rhyme lists.
Similar articles
-
Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?Psychol Res. 2007 Jul;71(4):448-57. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0042-2. Epub 2006 Jan 14. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16416144
-
Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):1001-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03193208. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16496721
-
Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.Mem Cognit. 2005 Apr;33(3):542-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03193070. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16156188
-
Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.Memory. 2004 May;12(3):314-37. doi: 10.1080/096582103440000426. Memory. 2004. PMID: 15279435
-
Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1110-41. doi: 10.1037/a0035784. Epub 2014 Feb 24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014. PMID: 24564540
Cited by
-
Interpreting potential markers of storage and rehearsal: Implications for studies of verbal short-term memory and neuropsychological cases.Mem Cognit. 2016 Aug;44(6):910-21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0602-2. Mem Cognit. 2016. PMID: 26968712
-
Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?Psychol Res. 2007 Jul;71(4):448-57. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0042-2. Epub 2006 Jan 14. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16416144
-
Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):1001-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03193208. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16496721
-
Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.Mem Cognit. 2005 Apr;33(3):542-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03193070. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16156188