. 2004 May 13;101(20):1810-2.

[Different opinions when it comes to research ethics issues concerning patients with dementia. A questionnaire study among members of research ethics committees]

[Article in Swedish]

Affiliations

[Article in Swedish]

Gunbrith Peterson et al. Lakartidningen. 2004.

. 2004 May 13;101(20):1810-2.

¹ Kliniska forskningsavdelningen, Janssen-Cilag AB, Sollentuna. gunbrith.peterson@jacse.jnj.com

No abstract available

Similar articles

Consent in clinical trials: what do patients know?
Hereu P, Pérez E, Fuentes I, Vidal X, Suñé P, Arnau JM. Hereu P, et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):443-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 10. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010. PMID: 20462521
[When the patient can't consent to participation in a trial: the Ethics Review Board should take over the decision responsibility from the relatives].
Risberg B. Risberg B. Lakartidningen. 2010 Jul 21-Aug 10;107(29-31):1787. Lakartidningen. 2010. PMID: 20812567 Swedish. No abstract available.
Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
Klitzman R. Klitzman R. Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00189.x. Dev World Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 19046258
[Ethics committees bear a responsibility for patient information. Informed consent implies that the patient understands what he has consented to].
Werkö L. Werkö L. Lakartidningen. 2002 Mar 19;99(14):1552-5. Lakartidningen. 2002. PMID: 12025208 Review. Swedish.
Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS, Vieira S, De Freitas CB. Hossne WS, et al. J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):131-41, 200. J Int Bioethique. 2008. PMID: 18664006 Review.