How do general practitioners rate their relationship with gastroenterologists?
- PMID: 15191199
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.01.015
How do general practitioners rate their relationship with gastroenterologists?
Abstract
Background: Relations between general practitioners and the hospital consultants are often considered difficult, and occasionally generate conflicts, potentially affecting the patient management and healthcare system organisation. These views, however, have partly been contradicted by structured surveys and qualitative studies.
Aims: We conducted a survey on the general practitioners' opinions regarding their relations with the gastroenterological-endoscopy services in order to explore current attitudes, any negative aspects and assess scope for improvement.
Subjects and methods: Structured questionnaires were sent to 221 general practitioners in the Veneto region of Italy; the questionnaire was based on 26 questions concerning their subjective relations with the gastroenterologists, expertise in the gastroenterological problems and perceived efficiency of gastroenterological services.
Results: As many as 106 doctors answered the postal questionnaire (mean: 15 per province; range 5-20). Responses to the structured questions totalled to 2,339 items, out of which 1,234 (53%) presented positive responses, particularly with regard to admissions' management and the adequacy of referral reports. Many general practitioners reported of their participation in the meetings on gastroenterological problems. Homecare referrals were limited in number, even for the patients with tube feeding.
Conclusions: Relations between the general practitioners in Veneto and local gastroenterological services were generally good, possibly reflecting the well-developed outreach network. This liaison could be further improved via closer interrelations based not only on the patient referrals but also on the professional and information exchange to promote successful practice.
Comment in
-
Poor communication between clinicians--poor care for patients!Dig Liver Dis. 2004 May;36(5):309-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.01.017. Dig Liver Dis. 2004. PMID: 15191197 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Integrated care for patients with asthma: views of general practitioners.Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):9-13. Br J Gen Pract. 1994. PMID: 8312046 Free PMC article.
-
Working with community mental health professionals: a survey among general practitioners.Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Oct;43(375):417-21. Br J Gen Pract. 1993. PMID: 8260220 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland.Aust J Rural Health. 2007 Apr;15(2):126-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00866.x. Aust J Rural Health. 2007. PMID: 17441822
-
[Dangerous liaisons: relation between oncologist and general practitioner].Rev Med Suisse. 2005 May 18;1(20):1356-8. Rev Med Suisse. 2005. PMID: 15991628 Review. French.
-
Criteria for Referring Patients With Outpatient Gastroenterological Disease for Specialist Consultation: A Review of the Literature.Gastroenterology Res. 2011 Oct;4(5):185-193. doi: 10.4021/gr350w. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Gastroenterology Res. 2011. PMID: 27957014 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jan 5;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17207278 Free PMC article.
-
Care of elderly people by the general practitioner and the geriatrician in Belgium: a qualitative study of their relationship.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:17-25. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S27617. Epub 2012 Jan 25. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012. PMID: 22328827 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials