Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality
- PMID: 15191441
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00212.x
Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality
Abstract
Background: The use of X-rays, computed tomography scanning and nuclear medicine imaging in the pregnant woman is a source of great anxiety for the patient, her family and the treating doctor.
Methods: A literature review of appropriate databases, articles and relevant institutional protocols was performed. Data was sought regarding any adverse effects of diagnostic radiation in pregnancy, fetal absorbed dose of diagnostic radiation and how the timing of exposure and form of administration might influence these effects.
Results: The estimated radiation dose for a fetus from background sources as well as medical imaging was identified. Most diagnostic radiation procedures will lead to a fetal absorbed dose of less than 1 mGy for imaging beyond the abdomen/pelvis and less than 10 mGy for direct or nuclear medicine imaging. Potential adverse outcomes related to radiation exposure during pregnancy include teratogenicity, genetic damage, intrauterine death and increased risk of malignancy. The only adverse effect statistically proven at the dose levels associated with diagnostic radiation procedures is a very small increase in childhood malignancy, with an estimated increase of one additional cancer death per 1700 10 mGy exposures. The important exception was the risk to the fetal thyroid from radioiodine exposure after 12 weeks' gestation.
Conclusion: In practice, diagnostic radiography during pregnancy not involving direct abdominal/pelvic high dosage, is not associated with any significant adverse events. Counselling of pregnant women who require diagnostic radiographic procedures as well as those inadvertently exposed should be based on the available human data with an emphasis on the minimal impact of such procedures.
Similar articles
-
Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;200(1):4-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.032. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19121655 Review.
-
[Diagnostic imaging during pregnancy].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Apr;134(14):686-9; discussion 690. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1208106. Epub 2009 Mar 24. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009. PMID: 19319769 Review. German.
-
Radiation during pregnancy.N J Med. 2001 Jun;98(6):29-33. N J Med. 2001. PMID: 11419187 Review.
-
Abdominal computed tomography during pregnancy: a review of indications and fetal radiation exposure issues.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010 Feb;31(1):3-7. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2009.09.001. Epub 2010 Jan 14. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010. PMID: 20102690 Review.
-
Radiation risks in pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Aug;60(2):237-42. Obstet Gynecol. 1982. PMID: 6760010 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical review: Ventilatory strategies for obstetric, brain-injured and obese patients.Crit Care. 2009;13(2):206. doi: 10.1186/cc7146. Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19291279 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cecal volvulus after twin gestation: laparoscopic approach.Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Oct;15 Suppl 1:S101-3. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0742-0. Tech Coloproctol. 2011. PMID: 21887568
-
Pregnancy in women with prosthetic heart valves.Neth Heart J. 2008 Dec;16(12):406-11. doi: 10.1007/BF03086187. Neth Heart J. 2008. PMID: 19127317 Free PMC article.
-
Trauma and pregnancy.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;45(10):622-632. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777339. Epub 2023 Dec 6. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 38057286 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis in a pregnant woman at 35 weeks of gestation: a case report and review of the literature.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2126-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30537943 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical