Unequal access to breast-conserving surgery in Western Australia 1982-2000
- PMID: 15191470
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03020.x
Unequal access to breast-conserving surgery in Western Australia 1982-2000
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of demographic, locational and social disadvantage and the possession of private health insurance in Western Australia on the likelihood of women with breast cancer receiving breast-conserving surgery rather than mastectomy.
Methods: The WA Record Linkage Project was used to extract all hospital morbidity, cancer and death records of women with breast cancer in Western Australia from 1982 to 2000 inclusive. Comparisons between those receiving breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy were made after adjustment for covariates in logistic regression.
Results: Younger women, especially those aged less than 60 years, and those with less comorbidity were more likely to receive breast-conserving surgery (BCS). In lower socio-economic groups, women were less likely to receive BCS (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.90). Women resident in rural areas tended to receive less BCS than those from metropolitan areas (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.55-1.29). Women treated in a rural hospital had a reduced likelihood of BCS (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.89). Treatment in a private hospital reduced the likelihood of BCS (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.90), while women with private health insurance were much more likely to receive BCS (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.79).
Conclusion: Several factors were found to affect the likelihood of women with breast cancer receiving breast-conserving surgery, in particular, women from disadvantaged backgrounds were significantly less likely to receive breast-conserving surgery than those from more privileged groups.
Comment in
-
Access to breast-conserving treatment: are surgeons responsible?ANZ J Surg. 2004 Jun;74(6):402-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.03104.x. ANZ J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15191467 No abstract available.
-
Variations in procedure rates: a need for population-based surgical research.ANZ J Surg. 2004 Jun;74(6):404-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.03105.x. ANZ J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15191468 No abstract available.
-
Unequal access to breast-conserving surgery.ANZ J Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;75(1-2):85. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03299.x. ANZ J Surg. 2005. PMID: 15740525 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The influence of socio-economic and locational disadvantage on survival after a diagnosis of lung or breast cancer in Western Australia.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Oct;9 Suppl 2:10-6. doi: 10.1258/1355819042248116. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004. PMID: 15511320
-
Colorectal cancer surgical care and survival: do private health insurance, socioeconomic and locational status make a difference?ANZ J Surg. 2005 Nov;75(11):929-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03583.x. ANZ J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16336380
-
Subsequent surgery after initial breast conserving surgery: a population based study.ANZ J Surg. 2005 May;75(5):260-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03352.x. ANZ J Surg. 2005. PMID: 15932433
-
Socioeconomic status, immigration/acculturation, and ethnic variations in breast conserving surgery, San Francisco Bay area.Ethn Dis. 2004 Winter;14(1):134-40. Ethn Dis. 2004. PMID: 15002933
-
Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women.Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 25. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 16870385 Review.
Cited by
-
Creation of a new clinical framework - why women choose mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0533-7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 29986654 Free PMC article.
-
Variations in outcomes by residential location for women with breast cancer: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 29;8(4):e019050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019050. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29706597 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the effects of socioeconomic status along the breast cancer continuum in Australian women: a systematic review of evidence.Int J Equity Health. 2017 Oct 16;16(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0676-x. Int J Equity Health. 2017. PMID: 29037209 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of community population size on breast cancer screening, stage distribution, treatment use and outcomes.Can J Public Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;103(1):46-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03404068. Can J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22338328 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Women's Choice of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2017 Feb 23;11:1179554917691266. doi: 10.1177/1179554917691266. eCollection 2017. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28469511 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources