Five-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration
- PMID: 15191590
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00518.x
Five-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration
Abstract
Background: Treatment with enamel matrix proteins (EMD) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to enhance periodontal regeneration. However, until now there are limited data on the long-term results following these treatment modalities.
Aim: The aim of the present clinical study was to present the 5-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with EMD, GTR, combination of EMD and GTR, and open flap debridement (OFD).
Material and methods: Forty-two patients, each of whom displayed one intrabony defect of a probing depth of at least 6 mm, were randomly treated with one of the four treatment modalities. The following parameters were evaluated prior to surgery, at 1 year and at 5 years after: plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival recession, and clinical attachment level (CAL). No statistically significant differences in any of the parameters were observed at baseline between the four groups.
Results: The sites treated with EMD demonstrated a mean CAL gain of 3.4+/-1.1 mm (p<0.001) and of 2.9+/-1.6 mm (p<0.001) at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The sites treated with GTR showed a mean CAL gain of 3.2+/-0.8 (p<0.001) at 1 year and of 2.7+/-0.9 mm (p<0.001) at 5 years. The mean CAL gain at sites treated with EMD+GTR was 3.0+/-1.0 mm (p<0.001) and 2.6+/-0.7 mm (p<0.001) at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The sites treated with OFD demonstrated a mean CAL gain of 1.6+/-1.0 mm (p<0.001) at 1 year and 1.3+/-1.2 mm (p<0.001) at 5 years. At 1 year, the only statistically significant difference between the four different treatments was found in terms of PPD reduction and CAL gain between EMD and OFD (p<0.05). However, at 5 years there were no statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters between the four different treatments.
Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it may be concluded that the short-term clinical results following treatment with EMD, GTR, EMD+GTR, and OFD can be maintained over a period of 5 years.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of intrabony defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative or bioabsorbable membrane: an 8-year follow-up split-mouth study.J Periodontol. 2006 Nov;77(11):1879-86. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060002. J Periodontol. 2006. PMID: 17076614 Clinical Trial.
-
Five-year clinical results for treatment of intrabony defects with EMD, guided tissue regeneration and open-flap debridement: a case series.J Periodontal Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):123-30. doi: 10.1111/jre.12188. Epub 2014 May 12. J Periodontal Res. 2015. PMID: 24815103
-
Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins or bioabsorbable membranes. A 4-year follow-up split-mouth study.J Periodontol. 2001 Dec;72(12):1695-701. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.12.1695. J Periodontol. 2001. PMID: 11811505 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: a literature review and meta-analysis.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Nov 1;15(6):382-402. doi: 10.1177/154411130401500605. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004. PMID: 15574680 Review.
-
Predictability of clinical outcomes following regenerative therapy in intrabony defects.J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):387-93. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.060521. J Periodontol. 2008. PMID: 18315419 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in controlled diabetic patients with an enamel matrix derivative: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2479-2489. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04215-w. Epub 2021 Oct 13. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34643808 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 10 years.J Periodontol. 2022 Apr;93(4):548-559. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0347. Epub 2021 Sep 8. J Periodontol. 2022. PMID: 34258767 Free PMC article.
-
Medium- and long-term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies.J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Mar;48(3):410-430. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13409. Epub 2021 Jan 21. J Clin Periodontol. 2021. PMID: 33289191 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors affecting periodontal regenerative therapy using recombinant human fibroblast growth factor-2: A 3-year cohort study.Regen Ther. 2022 Aug 27;21:271-276. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2022.07.006. eCollection 2022 Dec. Regen Ther. 2022. PMID: 36092500 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Adjunctive Bioactive Materials in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 27;2018:8670832. doi: 10.1155/2018/8670832. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 29977919 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources