Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source
- PMID: 15191944
- DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meh006
Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source
Abstract
While personal aerosol samplers have been characterized primarily based on wind tunnel tests conducted at relatively high wind speeds, modern indoor occupational environments are usually represented by very slow moving air. Recent surveys suggest that elevated levels of occupational exposure to inhalable airborne particles are typically observed when the worker, operating in the vicinity of the dust source, faces the source. Thus, the first objective of this study was to design and test a new, low cost experimental protocol for measuring the sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in the vicinity of the aerosol source when the samplers operate in very slowly moving air. In this system, an aerosol generator, which is located in the centre of a room-sized non-ventilated chamber, continuously rotates and omnidirectionally disperses test particles of a specific size. The test and reference samplers are equally distributed around the source at the same distance from the centre and operate in parallel (in most of our experiments, the total number of simultaneously operating samplers was 15). Radial aerosol transport is driven by turbulent diffusion and some natural convection. For each specific particle size and the sampler, the aerosol mass concentration is measured by weighing the collection filter. The second objective was to utilize the new protocol to evaluate three widely used aerosol samplers: the IOM Personal Inhalable Sampler, the Button Personal Inhalable Aerosol Sampler and the 25 mm Millipore filter holder (closed-face C25 cassette). The sampling efficiencies of each instrument were measured with six particle fractions, ranging from 6.9 to 76.9 micro m in their mass median aerodynamic diameter. The Button Sampler efficiency data demonstrated a good agreement with the standard inhalable convention and especially with the low air movement inhalabilty curve. The 25 mm filter holder was found to considerably under-sample the particles larger than 10 micro m; its efficiency did not exceed 7% for particles of 40-100 micro m. The IOM Sampler facing the source was found to over-sample compared with the data obtained previously with a slowly rotating, freely suspended sampler in a low air movement environment. It was also found that the particle wall deposition in the IOM metallic cartridge was rather significant and particle size-dependent. For each sampler (IOM, Button and C25) the precision was characterized through the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the aerosol concentration obtained with identical samplers in a specific experiment. The average RSD was 14% for the IOM Sampler, 11% for the Button Sampler and 35% for the 25 mm filter cassette. A separate set of experiments, performed with the Simplified Torso showed that in very slowly moving air a personal sampler can be adequately evaluated even when it is not attached to a body but freely suspended (confirming the data reported previously).
Similar articles
-
Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Mar;54(2):165-87. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep079. Epub 2010 Feb 10. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010. PMID: 20147627
-
Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds.Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Mar;56(2):207-20. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer089. Epub 2011 Oct 10. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012. PMID: 21985868
-
Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.J Environ Monit. 2004 Jan;6(1):18-22. doi: 10.1039/b312883k. Epub 2003 Dec 5. J Environ Monit. 2004. PMID: 14737465
-
New experimental methods for the development and evaluation of aerosol samplers.J Environ Monit. 2002 Oct;4(5):633-41. doi: 10.1039/b202274p. J Environ Monit. 2002. PMID: 12400907 Review.
-
Review of Workplace Based Aerosol Sampler Comparison Studies, 2004-2020.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136819. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34202035 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pesticide flow analysis to assess human exposure in greenhouse flower production in Colombia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Mar 25;10(4):1168-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10041168. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23528812 Free PMC article.
-
Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Sep;79(8):621-9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-006-0087-6. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006. PMID: 16506045
-
Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Aug;53(6):585-94. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep021. Epub 2009 May 14. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009. PMID: 19443852 Free PMC article.
-
Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Mar;56(2):194-206. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer077. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012. PMID: 21965462 Free PMC article.
-
A rotating bluff-body disc for reduced variability in wind tunnel aerosol studies.Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jan;55(1):86-96. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq078. Epub 2010 Nov 22. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011. PMID: 21097990 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical