Using lod scores to detect sex differences in male-female recombination fractions
- PMID: 15192282
- DOI: 10.1159/000077547
Using lod scores to detect sex differences in male-female recombination fractions
Abstract
Human recombination fraction (RF) can differ between males and females, but investigators do not always know which disease genes are located in genomic areas of large RF sex differences. Knowledge of RF sex differences contributes to our understanding of basic biology and can increase the power of a linkage study, improve gene localization, and provide clues to possible imprinting. One way to detect these differences is to use lod scores. In this study we focused on detecting RF sex differences and answered the following questions, in both phase-known and phase-unknown matings: (1) How large a sample size is needed to detect a RF sex difference? (2) What are "optimal" proportions of paternally vs. maternally informative matings? (3) Does ascertaining nonoptimal proportions of paternally or maternally informative matings lead to ascertainment bias? Our results were as follows: (1) We calculated expected lod scores (ELODs) under two different conditions: "unconstrained," allowing sex-specific RF parameters (theta(female), theta(male)); and "constrained," requiring theta(female) = theta(male). We then examined the DeltaELOD (identical with difference between maximized constrained and unconstrained ELODs) and calculated minimum sample sizes required to achieve statistically significant DeltaELODs. For large RF sex differences, samples as small as 10 to 20 fully informative matings can achieve statistical significance. We give general sample size guidelines for detecting RF differences in informative phase-known and phase-unknown matings. (2) We defined p as the proportion of paternally informative matings in the dataset; and the optimal proportion p(circ) as that value of p that maximizes DeltaELOD. We determined that, surprisingly, p(circ) does not necessarily equal (1/2), although it does fall between approximately 0.4 and 0.6 in most situations. (3) We showed that if p in a sample deviates from its optimal value, no bias is introduced (asymptotically) to the maximum likelihood estimates of theta(female) and theta(male), even though ELOD is reduced (see point 2). This fact is important because often investigators cannot control the proportions of paternally and maternally informative families. In conclusion, it is possible to reliably detect sex differences in recombination fraction.
Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
Similar articles
-
Do bilineal pedigrees represent a problem for linkage analysis? Basic principles and simulation results for single-gene diseases with no heterogeneity.Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(3):191-206. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090306. Genet Epidemiol. 1992. PMID: 1521781
-
Quantification of type I error probabilities for heterogeneity LOD scores.Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;22(2):156-69. doi: 10.1002/gepi.0155. Genet Epidemiol. 2002. PMID: 11788961
-
Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;21(4):299-314. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1036. Genet Epidemiol. 2001. PMID: 11754466
-
Alternative test for linkage between two loci.Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(2):117-31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:2<117::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-4. Genet Epidemiol. 1997. PMID: 9129958
-
More on selection for and against recombination.Theor Popul Biol. 1990 Aug;38(1):68-92. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(90)90004-f. Theor Popul Biol. 1990. PMID: 2205018 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effects of updating linkage evidence across subsets of data: reanalysis of the autism genetic resource exchange data set.Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Apr;76(4):688-95. doi: 10.1086/429345. Epub 2005 Feb 23. Am J Hum Genet. 2005. PMID: 15729670 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources