Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jun;144(6):770-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.042.

Lack of accuracy of continuous glucose sensors in healthy, nondiabetic children: results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Lack of accuracy of continuous glucose sensors in healthy, nondiabetic children: results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study

Nelly Mauras et al. J Pediatr. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The workup of hypoglycemia requires frequent glucose sampling. We designed these studies to determine if the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) and the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) are sufficiently accurate to use in nondiabetic children. Study design Fifteen healthy children (aged 9-17 years, 11 boys) wore a GW2B and a CGMS during a 24-hour period, and reference serum glucose was measured hourly during the day and half-hourly overnight.

Results: Compared with the reference glucose, the median absolute difference in concentrations measured by the GW2B (487 pairs) was 13 mg/dL, and the difference measured by the CGMS was 17 mg/dL (668 pairs), with 30% and 42% of values using the GW2B and CGMS, respectively, deviating >20 mg/dL from the reference value. The GW2B reported values <60 mg/dL in 73% of subjects, the CGMS in 60% of subjects. In none of these episodes was serum glucose truly low. Spurious high glucose concentrations also were observed with the sensors. The mean reference glucose was lowest at 5 am (89 mg/dL) and highest at 11:30 pm (106 mg/dL) during the 24-hour period.

Conclusions: Neither the CGMS nor the GW2B is accurate enough to establish population standards of the glycemic profile of healthy children and cannot be recommended in the workup of hypoglycemia in nondiabetic youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 A &B
Figure 1 A &B
Representative plots of the sensor and reference glucose values over a 24-hour period. In green is the GWB tracing and in blue the CGMS tracing. Solid points represent the reference laboratory glucose. Two tracings of the same color represent simultaneous use of two given monitors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean and range for reference serum glucose values over a 24-hour period.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Metzger M, Leibowitz G, Wainstein J, Glaser B, Raz I. Reproducibility of glucose measurements using the glucose sensor. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1185–91. - PubMed
    1. Kaufman FR, Austin J, Neinstein A, Jeng L, Halvorson M, Devoe DJ, et al. Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2002;141:625–30. - PubMed
    1. Kaufman FR, Halvorson GLCM, Carpenter S, Fisher LK, Pitukcheewanont P. A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring system:clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:2030–4. - PubMed
    1. Boland E, Monsod T, Delucia M, Brandt CA, Fernando S, Tamborlane WV. Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1858–62. - PubMed
    1. Chase HP, Kim LM, Owen SL, Mackenzie TA, Klingensmith GJ, Murtfeldts R, et al. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatrics. 2001;107:222–6. - PubMed