Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Apr;14(2):175-82.
doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00050.x.

Comparison of ethanol versus formalin fixation on preservation of histology and RNA in laser capture microdissected brain tissues

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of ethanol versus formalin fixation on preservation of histology and RNA in laser capture microdissected brain tissues

Jack Meng Fen Su et al. Brain Pathol. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Although RNA can be retrieved from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues, the yield is low, and the RNA is fragmented. Recent advances in gene expression profiling underscore the importance of identifying a fixative that preserves histology and mRNA. We demonstrated that, for immersion fixation of brains, 70% ethanol is superior to formalin for mRNA preservation. RNA yield from ethanol-fixed tissues was 70% of the yield from fresh frozen specimens, but only a negligible quantity was recovered from formalin-fixed tissues. RNA from ethanol-fixed brains showed integrity comparable to RNA from fresh frozen tissues, and RT-PCR using RNA from ethanol-fixed tissues was consistently successful. RNA from FFPE tissues composed of low-molecular weight fragments, and their use in RT-PCR failed repeatedly. The yield and quality of RNA from ethanol-fixed brains were unaffected after immersion at 4 degrees C for 2 weeks. In a blinded comparison to FFPE tissues, ethanol-fixed specimens were judged to show comparable histology and superior immunostaining. After laser capture microdissection (LCM), we failed to recover mRNA from FFPE tissues but retrieved mRNA from ethanol-fixed tissues for RT-PCR and cDNA microarray analysis. We conclude that 70% ethanol preserves RNA integrity and is suitable for expression profiling of brain tissues by LCM and cDNA microarray.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahram M, Flaig MJ, Gillespie JW, Duray PH, Linehan WM, Ornstein DK, Niu S, Zhao Y, Petricoin EF 3rd, Emmert‐Buck MR (2003) Evaluation of ethanol‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissues for proteomic applications. Proteomics 3:413–421. - PubMed
    1. Auerbach C, Moutschen‐Dahmen M, Moutschen J (1977) Genetic and cytogenetic effects of formaldehyde and related compounds. Mutation Research 39:317–362. - PubMed
    1. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1998) Preparation and analysis of RNA. In: Current protocols in molecular biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York .
    1. Ben‐Ezra J, Johnson DA, Rossi J, Cook N, Wu A (1991) Effect of fixation on the amplification of nucleic acids from paraffin‐embedded material by the polymerase chain reaction. J Histochem Cytochem 39:351–354. - PubMed
    1. Bresters D, Schipper MEI, Reesink HW, BoeserNunnink BDM, Cuypers HTM (1994) The duration of fixation influences the yield of HCV cDNA‐PCR products from formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded liver tissue. J Virol Methods 48:267–272. - PubMed

Publication types