This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2004 Jun 12;363(9425):1921-2.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16437-4.

Preventing unnecessary caesarean sections: marginal benefit of a second opinion

Maureen Porter¹, Siladitya Bhattacharya

Affiliations

PMID: 15194248
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16437-4

Comment

Preventing unnecessary caesarean sections: marginal benefit of a second opinion

Maureen Porter et al. Lancet. 2004.

. 2004 Jun 12;363(9425):1921-2.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16437-4.

Authors

Maureen Porter¹, Siladitya Bhattacharya

Affiliation

¹ Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. m.a.porter@abdn.ac.uk

PMID: 15194248
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16437-4

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Althabe F, Belizán JM, Villar J, Alexander S, Bergel E, Ramos S, Romero M, Donner A, Lindmark G, Langer A, Farnot U, Cecatti JG, Carroli G, Kestler E; Latin American Caesarean Section Study Group. Althabe F, et al. Lancet. 2004 Jun 12;363(9425):1934-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16406-4. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15194252 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information