Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials
- PMID: 15194600
- PMCID: PMC478224
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38121.684410.AE
Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2004 Aug 28;329(7464):499
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure levels and proportion of people with essential hypertension achieving targets.
Design: Meta-analysis of 18 randomised controlled trials.
Participants: 1359 people with essential hypertension allocated to home blood pressure monitoring and 1355 allocated to the "control" group seen in the healthcare system for 2-36 months.
Main outcome measures: Differences in systolic (13 studies), diastolic (16 studies), or mean (3 studies) blood pressures, and proportion of patients achieving targets (6 studies), between intervention and control groups.
Results: Systolic blood pressure was lower in people with hypertension who had home blood pressure monitoring than in those who had standard blood pressure monitoring in the healthcare system (standardised mean difference 4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 6.9) mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure was lower by 2.4 (1.2 to 3.5) mm Hg, and mean blood pressure was lower by 4.4 (2.0 to 6.8) mm Hg. The relative risk of blood pressure above predetermined targets was lower in people with home blood pressure monitoring (risk ratio 0.90, 0.80 to 1.00). When publication bias was allowed for, the differences were attenuated: 2.2 (-0.9 to 5.3) mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 1.9 (0.6 to 3.2) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions: Blood pressure control in people with hypertension (assessed in the clinic) and the proportion achieving targets are increased when home blood pressure monitoring is used rather than standard blood pressure monitoring in the healthcare system. The reasons for this are not clear. The difference in blood pressure control between the two methods is small but likely to contribute to an important reduction in vascular complications in the hypertensive population.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2021 Jan 19;372:m4858. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4858. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 33468518 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Masked Hypertension Defined by Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in a Japanese General Practice Population.JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):583-590. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1233. JAMA Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29800067 Free PMC article.
-
What is the value of home (self) blood pressure monitoring in patients with hypertensive heart disease?Am J Hypertens. 1998 Jul;11(7):813-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00026-0. Am J Hypertens. 1998. PMID: 9683042
-
Exercise Reduces Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(24):e018487. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018487. Epub 2020 Dec 5. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 33280503 Free PMC article.
-
Self-measurement of blood pressure at home in the management of hypertension.Clin Med Res. 2005 Feb;3(1):19-26. doi: 10.3121/cmr.3.1.19. Clin Med Res. 2005. PMID: 15962017 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease.Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015 Sep;11(9):555-63. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.114. Epub 2015 Jul 28. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26215512 Review.
-
Monitoring in chronic disease: a rational approach.BMJ. 2005 Mar 19;330(7492):644-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.644. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15774996 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
The case for home monitoring in hypertension.BMC Med. 2010 Sep 27;8:55. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-55. BMC Med. 2010. PMID: 20875117 Free PMC article.
-
Accessibility of home blood pressure monitors for blind and visually impaired people.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Mar;1(2):218-27. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007. PMID: 19888410 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of digital health interventions on depression and anxiety in patients with cardiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Jul 21;3(3):445-454. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac037. eCollection 2022 Sep. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 36712158 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S, Hebert P, Fiebach NH, Eberlein KA, et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. II. Short term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 1990;335: 827-38. - PubMed
-
- MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. I. Effect of prolonged differences in blood pressure: evidence from nine prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990;335: 765-74. - PubMed
-
- Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002;360: 1903-13. - PubMed
-
- Prospective Studies Collaboration. Cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and stroke: 13,000 strokes in 450,000 people in 45 prospective cohorts. Lancet 1995;346: 1647-53. - PubMed
-
- Primatesta P, Brookes M, Poulter NR. Improved hypertension management and control: results from the health survey for England 1998. Hypertension 2001;38: 827-32. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical