Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification
- PMID: 15198112
- DOI: 10.1177/00238309030460040101
Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification
Abstract
The experiments reported here were designed to investigate the influence of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification of disyllabic English words by native and non-native speakers. Trochaic nouns and iambic gram verbs were considered to be typically stressed, whereas iambic nouns and trochaic verbs were considered to be atypically stressed. Experiments 1a and 2a showed that while native speakers classified typically stressed words individual more quickly and more accurately than atypically stressed words during differences reading, there were no overall effects during classification of spoken stimuli. However, a subgroup of native speakers with high error rates did show a significant effect during classification of spoken stimuli. Experiments 1b and 2b showed that non-native speakers classified typically stressed words more quickly and more accurately than atypically stressed words during reading. Typically stressed words were classified more accurately than atypically stressed words when the stimuli were spoken. Importantly, there was a significant relationship between error rates, vocabulary size and the size of the stress typicality effect in each experiment. We conclude that participants use information about lexical stress to help them distinguish between disyllabic nouns and verbs during speeded grammatical classification. This is especially so for individuals with a limited vocabulary who lack other knowledge (e.g., semantic knowledge) about the differences between these grammatical categories.
Similar articles
-
Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and nonnative speakers of English: evidence from onset gating.Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):21-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03195817. Mem Cognit. 2004. PMID: 15078041
-
The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 May;59(5):920-48. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000782. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006. PMID: 16608755
-
A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English.J Psycholinguist Res. 2010 Aug;39(4):323-44. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9142-2. J Psycholinguist Res. 2010. PMID: 20033291
-
A structure and meaning based classification of lexical categories.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;433:21-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb14758.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984. PMID: 6397088 Review.
-
Operational Noology as a new methodology for the study of thought and language: theoretical aspects and possible practical applications.Cogn Process. 2006 Dec;7(4):217-43. doi: 10.1007/s10339-006-0145-8. Epub 2006 Aug 9. Cogn Process. 2006. PMID: 16897066 Review.
Cited by
-
Native Thai speakers' acquisition of English word stress patterns.J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 May;35(3):285-304. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9016-9. J Psycholinguist Res. 2006. PMID: 16625424
-
Cues to stress assignment in reading aloud.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jan;147(1):36-61. doi: 10.1037/xge0000380. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018. PMID: 29309196 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and nonnative speakers of English: evidence from onset gating.Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):21-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03195817. Mem Cognit. 2004. PMID: 15078041
-
GreekLex 2: A comprehensive lexical database with part-of-speech, syllabic, phonological, and stress information.PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172493. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28231303 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources