Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Jul:(588):8-13.

Damage control surgery for abdominal trauma

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15200036
Review

Damage control surgery for abdominal trauma

Masoud M Bashir et al. Eur J Surg Suppl. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To review the physiology, indications, technical aspects, morbidity, and mortality of damage control surgery.

Design: Retrospective study of published papers.

Setting: Teaching hospital, United Arab Emirates.

Interventions: A MEDLINE search on damage control surgery for the years 1981-2001. Further articles were retrieved from the references of the original articles.

Results: The indications for damage control surgery are: the need to terminate a laparotomy rapidly in an exsanguinating, hypothermic patient who had developed a coagulopathy and who is about to die on the operating table; inability to control bleeding by direct haemostasis; and inability to close the abdomen without tension because of massive visceral oedema and a tense abdominal wall. The principles of damage control surgery are: Phase I: laparotomy to control haemorrhage by packing; shunting, or balloon tamponade, or both; control of intestinal spillage by resection or ligation of damaged bowel, or both. Phase II: physiological resuscitation to correct hypothermia, metabolic acidosis, and coagulopathy. Phase III: planned reoperation for definitive repair. Damage control surgery is appropriate in a small number of critically ill patients who are likely to require substantial hospital resources; it has a high mortality (mean 45%, range (10%-69%).

Conclusion: Damage control surgery offers a simple effective alternative to the traditional surgical management of complex or multiple injuries in critically injured patients. Phases I and II can be done at a rural hospital before transfer to a major trauma centre for definitive repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by