A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC)
- PMID: 15200748
- DOI: 10.1185/030079904125003700
A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC)
Abstract
Objective: The Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) is an established method for the controlled exposure of patients to specific allergens, used to make valid comparisons between antihistamines. The aim of the significantly more than loratadine at all time two placebo-controlled, randomised studies reported here was to compare the efficacy and safety of levocetirizine 5 mg od and loratadine 10 mg od in subjects suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
Subjects and methods: During each study period, SAR and PAR subjects were exposed to grass pollen or house-dust mite allergens, respectively for 6 h on 2 consecutive days in the VCC. Each day, medications were administered 2 h after the start of the challenge; with a washout of at least 5 days between each period. The main criterion for evaluation of efficacy was the major symptom complex (MSC) for SAR and the complex symptom score (CSS) for PAR.
Results: The pattern of patients' response was similar in SAR and PAR. Both levocetirizine and loratadine were superior to placebo in alleviating SAR and PAR symptoms at all time intervals evaluated during the two study days. Levocetirizine decreased the mean MSC score intervals in SAR subjects, with the most marked difference observed on day 2 (p = 0.002). In PAR patients, although with borderline significance (p = 0.08), levocetirizine decreased the mean CSS more than loratadine. Levocetirizine appeared to have a faster onset of action than loratadine in SAR (45 min versus 1 h 15 min) and PAR (1 h versus 1 h 30 min). However, these apparent differences were not tested for statistical significance. Both medications were well tolerated and no treatment-related adverse events were reported. This level of antihistamine efficacy was maintained regardless of whether the subjects' rhinitis was seasonal or perennial.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that levocetirizine is superior to loratadine in improving symptoms in SAR and that there is a similar trend in PAR.
Similar articles
-
Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70172-1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998. PMID: 9600501 Clinical Trial.
-
Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.Int Immunopharmacol. 2005 Dec;5(13-14):1800-8. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.05.008. Epub 2005 Jun 13. Int Immunopharmacol. 2005. PMID: 16275616 Clinical Trial.
-
Levocetirizine in children: evidenced efficacy and safety in a 6-week randomized seasonal allergic rhinitis trial.Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 May;16(3):267-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00216.x. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005. PMID: 15853959 Clinical Trial.
-
Levocetirizine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults and children.Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1664-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.015. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19808127 Review.
-
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):921-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.017. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19539095 Review.
Cited by
-
Onset of action for loratadine tablets for the symptomatic control of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults challenged with ragweed pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit: a post hoc analysis of total symptom score.Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan 16;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s13223-017-0227-4. eCollection 2018. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018. PMID: 29371864 Free PMC article.
-
The safety and efficacy of desloratadine for the management of allergic disease.Drug Saf. 2005;28(12):1101-18. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528120-00005. Drug Saf. 2005. PMID: 16329713 Review.
-
Levocetirizine: a review of its use in the management of allergic rhinitis and skin allergies.Drugs. 2006;66(7):973-96. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666070-00017. Drugs. 2006. PMID: 16740020 Review.
-
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(4):217-30. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847040-00001. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008. PMID: 18336052 Review.
-
Pharmacoeconomic Assessment of Antiallergic Drugs by Comparing Serum Immunoglobulin E Level as a Diagnostic and Monitoring Indicator of Allergic Rhinitis in Rural Population of India.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Apr;75(Suppl 1):928-933. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03488-9. Epub 2023 Jan 29. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 37206771 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous