Meta-analysis on the effect of off-pump coronary bypass surgery
- PMID: 15200983
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.03.032
Meta-analysis on the effect of off-pump coronary bypass surgery
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of conventional coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) compared to the off-pump procedure (OPCAB).
Methods: Based on randomised trials found in PubMed and Science Citation Index, an overall odds ratio and 95% confidence interval was calculated for the combined endpoint of mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction.
Results: The 18 randomised trials included 1584 patients (783 OPCAB, 801 CABG). The odds ratio was 0.73 (95% CI=0.26; 2.04) at 2-week post-surgery, 0.75 (0.39; 1.42) at 1-month post-surgery, 0.55 (0.28; 1.08) at 3-month post-surgery, and 0.66 (0.38; 1.15) at 1-year post-surgery.
Conclusions: The outcome of this meta-analysis shows favourable results for OPCAB for the combined endpoint of mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction at short and long term follow-up. However, none of the risk reductions reach statistical significance at the conventional level. Based on our results OPCAB appears to be equivalent to CABG.
Similar articles
-
On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jul;34(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.031. Epub 2008 May 2. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18450460
-
Meta-analysis of on-pump and off-pump coronary arterial revascularization.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Mar;87(3):757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.042. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19231385
-
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Meta-analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):60-77.e1-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.042. Epub 2015 Aug 15. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26433633 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass.Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jan;125(2):338-44. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012. PMID: 22340570
-
Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials.Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(10):1257-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr307. Epub 2011 Oct 10. Eur Heart J. 2012. PMID: 21987177 Review.
Cited by
-
Is off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting superior to conventional bypass in octogenarians?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Nov 4. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21051050 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.Can J Surg. 2007 Aug;50(4):266-77. Can J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17897515 Free PMC article.
-
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD007224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007224.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22419321 Free PMC article.
-
Pump or no pump for coronary artery bypass: current best available evidence.Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(4):489-501. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005. PMID: 16429892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controversies in off-pump coronary artery surgery.Clin Med Res. 2005 Feb;3(1):27-33. doi: 10.3121/cmr.3.1.27. Clin Med Res. 2005. PMID: 15962018 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
