A comparison of the nauseogenic potential of low-frequency vertical versus horizontal linear oscillation
- PMID: 1520219
A comparison of the nauseogenic potential of low-frequency vertical versus horizontal linear oscillation
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the nauseogenic potential of low-frequency linear motion in the Earth-vertical versus the Earth-horizontal plane, delivered through the same Z-axis of the head and body. Twelve subjects were challenged with linear motion (0.3 Hz, 1.8 ms-2 rms) through the same head and body Z-axis in the Earth-vertical (sitting upright) versus horizontal (lying on the back), while either performing a continuous visual search task or with their eyes closed. Each subject completed the four conditions on a Latin square design with sessions spaced 1 week apart at the same time of day. Vertical motion was clearly more provocative than horizontal motion, and nauseogenicity of motion was exacerbated by a visual search task. Motion sickness impaired performance of the search task. Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (MSSQ) scores correlated with individual susceptibility to the motion challenge. Mean sickness ratings for vertical motion showed some correspondence with those predicted by mathematical models of motion sickness dose response relationships.
Similar articles
-
Effect of frequency of horizontal linear oscillation on motion sickness and somatogravic illusion.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Feb;67(2):121-6. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996. PMID: 8834936 Clinical Trial.
-
Perceptual scaling of whole-body low frequency linear oscillatory motion.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 Jul;64(7):636-40. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993. PMID: 8357318
-
Frequency effect of 0.35-1.0 Hz horizontal translational oscillation on motion sickness and the somatogravic illusion.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 May;68(5):396-402. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997. PMID: 9143749
-
Pathophysiology and treatment of motion sickness.Curr Opin Neurol. 2015 Feb;28(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000163. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015. PMID: 25502048 Review.
-
Effects of dynamic visual feedback system on seasickness.Appl Ergon. 2024 Sep;119:104318. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104318. Epub 2024 May 25. Appl Ergon. 2024. PMID: 38797015 Review.
Cited by
-
Labyrinthine lesions and motion sickness susceptibility.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(4):477-87. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0759-1. Epub 2007 Jan 26. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17256169 Free PMC article.
-
Motion sickness on tilting trains.FASEB J. 2011 Nov;25(11):3765-74. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-184887. Epub 2011 Jul 25. FASEB J. 2011. PMID: 21788449 Free PMC article.
-
Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR).Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(2):207-22. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2305-4. Epub 2010 Jun 10. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20535456 Free PMC article.
-
Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.J Vestib Res. 2021;31(5):327-344. doi: 10.3233/VES-200005. J Vestib Res. 2021. PMID: 33646187 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of the selective muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist darifenacin, and of hyoscine (scopolamine), on motion sickness, skin conductance & cognitive function.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1535-1543. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13579. Epub 2018 Apr 19. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29522648 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical