A new non-invasive method for recording the electro-olfactogram using external electrodes
- PMID: 15203064
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.010
A new non-invasive method for recording the electro-olfactogram using external electrodes
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this investigation was to explore the possibility of recording the electro-olfactogram (EOG) using external electrodes placed on the root of the nose on either side of the bridge and at the medial termination of the eyebrows. The EOG is considered to be the summated generator potential of olfactory receptor cells and therefore represents peripheral olfactory events. Recording of human EOG is technically difficult due to poor access to the olfactory mucosa and the nasal irritation is tolerated by few subjects.
Methods: The evoked potentials at these sites in response to two odourants, n-amyl acetate and benzaldehyde, were recorded simultaneously with the EOG, recorded conventionally with an intranasal electrode, and the olfactory event-related potential (OERP) recorded using scalp electrodes.
Results: The extranasal potential recorded at the root of the nose, 0.5-1 cm below the nasion, 1 cm from the ridge and ipsilateral with the stimulus, had the highest degree of correlation with the intranasal EOG. We refer to this site as N1 (left side) and N2 (right side). Further analysis demonstrated that the latency, the time constant of the rising phase and the amplitude of the evoked potential recorded at N1 also had a higher correlation coefficient with the EOG than did those potentials recorded at other sites. Statistical analysis indicated that the latency and time constant of the response recorded externally at N1 were the same as those of the EOG recorded intranasally.
Conclusions: We conclude that an olfactory evoked potential, with many of the characteristics of the EOG recorded from the olfactory mucosa, can be recorded externally at a site close to the bridge of the nose.
Significance: This non-invasive method of recording the EOG will have benefits for the objective assessment of olfactory function.
Similar articles
-
Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium.Laryngoscope. 2000 Mar;110(3 Pt 1):417-21. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200003000-00016. Laryngoscope. 2000. PMID: 10718430
-
Recording odor-evoked response potentials at the human olfactory epithelium.Chem Senses. 2013 Jan;38(1):3-17. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs073. Epub 2012 Sep 2. Chem Senses. 2013. PMID: 22944611 Review.
-
Evidence for peripheral plasticity in human odour response.J Physiol. 2004 Jan 1;554(Pt 1):236-44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.054726. J Physiol. 2004. PMID: 14678505 Free PMC article.
-
The electroolfactogram: a review of its history and uses.Microsc Res Tech. 2002 Aug 1;58(3):152-60. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10133. Microsc Res Tech. 2002. PMID: 12203693
-
Recording of the human electro-olfactogram.Physiol Behav. 2004 Oct 30;83(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.07.024. Physiol Behav. 2004. PMID: 15501486 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Lidocaine on Olfactory Perception in Humans.Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):164-168. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_2_18. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018. PMID: 30123746 Free PMC article.
-
Electrophysiological and olfactometric evaluation of long-term COVID-19.Physiol Rep. 2021 Sep;9(18):e14992. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14992. Physiol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34536067 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources