Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature
- PMID: 15203852
- DOI: 10.1080/01421590410001696434
Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature
Abstract
Although assessing professionalism poses many challenges, gauging and detecting changes in professionalism is impossible without measurement. This paper is a review of techniques used to assess professionalism during the past 20 years. The authors searched five electronic databases and reference lists from 1982 to 2002. Eighty-eight assessments were retained and organized into content area addressed (i.e. ethics, personal characteristics, comprehensive professionalism, diversity) and type of outcome examined (i.e. affective, cognitive, behavioral, environmental). Instead of creating new professionalism assessments, existing assessments should be improved. Also, more studies on the predictive validity of assessments and their use as part of formative evaluation systems are recommended. Based on the review, suggestions are presented for assessing medical students, resident physicians and practicing physicians.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.Med Teach. 2011;33(5):354-63. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577300. Med Teach. 2011. PMID: 21517683
-
Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002.Acad Med. 2005 Apr;80(4):366-70. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200504000-00014. Acad Med. 2005. PMID: 15793022 Review.
-
Effectiveness of faculty training to enhance clinical evaluation of student competence in ethical reasoning and professionalism.J Dent Educ. 2007 Aug;71(8):1048-57. J Dent Educ. 2007. PMID: 17687087
-
Assessing professional behavior: yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Acad Med. 2002 Jun;77(6):502-15. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200206000-00006. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12063194 Review.
-
Assessment of professionalism in integrated curriculum: the faculty's perspective.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Nov;23(10):771-4. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013. PMID: 24169382
Cited by
-
Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations.Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Jun 15;72(3):58. doi: 10.5688/aj720358. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008. PMID: 18698367 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education.Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Jun;21(3):789-807. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9644-2. Epub 2015 Mar 28. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25820149
-
The influence of personal and environmental factors on professionalism in medical education.BMC Med Educ. 2007 Aug 30;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-29. BMC Med Educ. 2007. PMID: 17760986 Free PMC article.
-
Students' self-assessment of achievement of terminal competency and 4-year trend of student evaluation on outcome-based education.Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Mar;31(1):39-50. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.117. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Korean J Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 30852860 Free PMC article.
-
Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 May 8;8(5):e12039. doi: 10.2196/12039. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. PMID: 31066707 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous