Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Oct;43(10):1262-70.
doi: 10.1007/s00120-004-0622-6.

[The 80 W potassium-titanium-phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization of the prostate. Technique and 6 month follow-up after 70 procedures]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

[The 80 W potassium-titanium-phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization of the prostate. Technique and 6 month follow-up after 70 procedures]

[Article in German]
A Bachmann et al. Urologe A. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Despite good efficacy, even in our days, TURP remains a potentially difficult procedure to perform and is associated with significant risks for the patient. Several alternatives have been tried to reduce the known perioperative morbidity. We report our first experiences with 80 W potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization of the prostate in patients with symptomatic BPH.

Patients and methods: In 70 patients 80 W KTP laser vaporization was performed successfully. Mean age was 70.5 years (46-93 years) and mean transrectal prostate volume was 48.1 ml (10-250 ml).

Results: Mean operating time was 41 min ( n=22), 64 min ( n=33), and 80 min ( n=15) for a 26 ml, 46 ml, and a 91 ml prostate, respectively. At time of discharge, after 1 month, and 6 months the urinary peak flow increased by 75.4%, 166.8%, and 168.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: The 80 W KTP laser vaporization of the prostate combines the tissue-debulking properties of transurethral resection of the prostate with the known good hemostatic properties of other laser procedures. It is a safe procedure for the patient and provides a virtually bloodless operation and immediate improvement of voiding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Urol. 1994 Jun;73(6):669-80 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1996 Oct;48(4):575-83 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Urol. 2002 Jan;12(1):19-23 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 1999 Nov;84(7):805-9 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):465-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources