Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Oct;31(10):1413-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1577-y. Epub 2004 Jun 16.

Value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Akiko Suzuki et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Peritoneal carcinomatosis can be difficult to diagnose using computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of 2-(fluorine 18) fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Methods: We reviewed the CT and FDG PET radiological reports and clinical charts of 18 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and 17 cancer patients without peritoneal carcinomatosis. We also assessed FDG PET scans from 20 healthy volunteers as a baseline study. The maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) over peritoneal lesions in cancer patients and over the area of most intense intestinal uptake in healthy volunteers and cancer patients without peritoneal carcinomatosis were measured.

Results: The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of combined FDG PET and CT were superior to those of CT alone for the detection of peritoneal lesions (sensitivity: 66.7% vs 22.2%, p<0.025; PPV: 92.3% vs 50.0%, p<0.05). The most frequent pattern of FDG uptake in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis was abnormally intense focal uptake near the abdominal wall. An SUVmax threshold of 5.1 produced a diagnostic accuracy of combined FDG PET and CT of 78%. The additional information provided by FDG PET allowed a more accurate diagnosis in 14 patients (40.0%), and led to alteration of the therapeutic strategy in five (14.3%) of the enrolled cancer patients.

Conclusion: We found that use of an intra-abdominal FDG uptake cut-off value for SUVmax of >5.1 assists in the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. FDG PET may play an important role in the clinical management of patients with suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 1993 Sep 1;72 (5):1631-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 May;95(5):1381 - PubMed
    1. Abdom Imaging. 1997 Mar-Apr;22(2):235-6 - PubMed
    1. Nucl Med Biol. 2000 Oct;27(7):643-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(6):886-900 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources