An economic evaluation of intermittent cyclosporin A therapy versus UVAB phototherapy in the treatment of patients with severe atopic dermatitis
- PMID: 15206694
- DOI: 10.1080/000155503100071666
An economic evaluation of intermittent cyclosporin A therapy versus UVAB phototherapy in the treatment of patients with severe atopic dermatitis
Abstract
We performed a cost-effective evaluation of cyclosporin A versus UVAB phototherapy in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis. The analysis was based on a one-year open prospective clinical trial conducted in Finland and showed that patients who received intermittent cyclosporin A therapy had on average 191 remission days per year, i.e. where disease activity was reduced by 50% or more. Patients receiving UVAB phototherapy had on average 123 remission days per year. All costs were estimated for the one-year period. Health service utilization of the 2 treatment groups was estimated based on the data gathered during the clinical study. Total costs were USD 5,438 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 5,635 in the UVAB group. Direct health-care costs were USD 4,935 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 3,124 in the UVAB group. The cost of a remission day was USD 28 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 46 in the UVAB group. In terms of direct health-care costs, the cost of a remission day was USD 26 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 25 in the UVAB group. Our results demonstrate that cyclosporin A therapy is similarly cost-effective as UVAB phototherapy in terms of total cost in the treatment of atopic dermatitis unresponsive to topical treatment. In terms of direct health-care costs, i.e. treatment and health services utilization costs, however, UVAB is significantly less costly, but side effects are frequent.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of cyclosporin and UVAB phototherapy for intermittent one-year treatment of atopic dermatitis.Acta Derm Venereol. 2001 Jan-Feb;81(1):22-7. doi: 10.1080/00015550120235. Acta Derm Venereol. 2001. PMID: 11411908 Clinical Trial.
-
Phototherapy for atopic dermatitis with ultraviolet A (UVA), low-dose UVB and combined UVA and UVB: two paired-comparison studies.Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1991 Aug;8(4):151-6. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1991. PMID: 1814425 Clinical Trial.
-
Phototherapy of atopic dermatitis with ultraviolet radiation.Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1992;171:1-37. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1992. PMID: 1585754 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacoeconomics of drug therapy for atopic dermatitis.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 Mar;3(3):249-55. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.3.249. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002. PMID: 11866675 Review.
-
Cyclosporin treatment of atopic dermatitis: five case studies and literature review.Australas J Dermatol. 1994;35(2):55-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.1994.tb00895.x. Australas J Dermatol. 1994. PMID: 7702488 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of eczema.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007 Dec;33(3):204-25. doi: 10.1007/s12016-007-0033-8. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007. PMID: 18163227 Review.
-
Therapy of atopic eczema.GMS Health Technol Assess. 2006 Oct 6;2:Doc19. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 21289970 Free PMC article.
-
Phototherapy for atopic eczema.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 28;10(10):CD013870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013870.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34709669 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating drug costs in economic evaluations in Ireland and the UK: an analysis of practice and research recommendations.Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(8):635-43. doi: 10.2165/10899570-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009. PMID: 19712007 Review.
-
Understanding economic evidence for the prevention and treatment of atopic eczema.Br J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;181(4):707-716. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17696. Epub 2019 Apr 11. Br J Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 30693473 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources