Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Jun;113(6):1122-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.038.

Topical antifungal treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Topical antifungal treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Michael Weschta et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Recently, fungal elements were suspected to be the causative agent of chronic rhinosinusitis, and benefits of topical amphotericin B therapy have been reported.

Objective: The effects of amphotericin B versus control nasal spray on chronic rhinosinusitis were compared in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Methods: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were administered 200 microL per nostril amphotericin B (3 mg/mL) or saline nasal spray 4 times daily over a period of 8 weeks. The response rate, defined as a 50% reduction of pretreatment computed tomography score, was the primary outcome variable. Additional outcome variables included a symptom score, a quality of life score, and an endoscopy score. Before and after treatment, nasal lavages were pretreated with dithiothreitol and examined for fungal elements by PCR and standard culture techniques.

Results: Seventy-eight patients were included, and 60 patients finished the study per protocol. In the control group, no positive response (0 of 32) was observed, and 2 of 28 patients responded in the amphotericin B group (P>.2). The symptom scores were distinctly worse after amphotericin B therapy (P <.005). The other parameters investigated did not differ remarkably between the treatment groups.

Conclusion: Nasal amphotericin B spray in the described dosing and time schedule is ineffective and deteriorates patient symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types