Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Jan-Feb;8(1):19-21.

Dynamic tests to study liver function

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15209151
Review

Dynamic tests to study liver function

P Burra et al. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2004 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Two approaches have generally been used to assessing liver function: one is to measure the products of liver synthesis, the other is to monitor hepatic clearance function. The exogenous dyes that can be used to study liver function are sulphobromophthalein (BSF) and indocyanine green (ICG). One valuable way to measure hepatic function is to use non-toxic substances (stains, sugar, drugs) that are selectively metabolized by the liver and determine the rates of metabolism of these substances in vivo. The antipyrine clearance test is the most common and correlates well with the degree of liver damage. The caffeine clearance test is beneficial in severe liver lesions, but practically useless in the case of moderate liver damage. The galactose clearance test can be used early in the clinical course of jaundice to distinguish between hepatocellular disease and biliary obstruction. The MEGX test is useful as a real-time method for quantitatively assessing pre- and post-transplant liver function. In short, quantitative liver function tests are not suitable for use in screening for liver disease. They are more complex to perform and more expensive than conventional biochemical tests, but superior in monitoring the degree of liver dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances