Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Mar-Apr;31(2):65-71.
doi: 10.1097/00152192-200403000-00005.

Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice

Laura Bolton et al. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Wound-healing outcomes applying standardized protocols have typically been measured within controlled clinical trials, not natural settings. Standardized protocols of wound care have been validated for clinical use, creating an opportunity to measure the resulting outcomes.

Purpose: Wound-healing outcomes were explored during clinical use of standardized validated protocols of care based on patient and wound assessments.

Design: This was a prospective multicenter study of wound-healing outcomes management in real-world clinical practice.

Method: Healing outcomes from March 26 to October 31, 2001, were recorded on patients in 3 long-term care facilities, 1 long-term acute care hospital, and 12 home care agencies for wounds selected by staff to receive care based on computer-generated validated wound care algorithms. After diagnosis, wound dimensions and status were assessed using a tool adapted from the Pressure Sore Status Toolfor use on all wounds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing professionals accessed consistent protocols of care, via telemedicine in home care or paper forms in long-term care. A physician entered assessments into a desktop computer in the wound clinic. Based on evidence that healing proceeds faster with fewer infections in environments without gauze, the protocols generally avoided gauze dressings.

Results: Most of the 767 wounds selected to receive the standardized-protocols of care were stage III-IV pressure ulcers (n = 373; mean healing time 62 days) or full-thickness venous ulcers (n = 124; mean healing time 57 days). Partial-thickness wounds healed faster than same-etiology full-thickness wounds.

Conclusions: These results provide benchmarks for natural-setting healing outcomes and help to define and address wound care challenges. Outcomes primarily using nongauze protocols of care matched or surpassed best previously published results on similar wounds using gauze-based protocols of care, including protocols applying gauze impregnated with growth factors or other agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The value of a WOCN.
    Moore KN. Moore KN. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;31(5):245; discussion 245-8. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200409000-00001. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15867719 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types