Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun 29;43(25):8204-16.
doi: 10.1021/bi035335i.

Receptor binding kinetics and cellular responses of six N-formyl peptide agonists in human neutrophils

Affiliations

Receptor binding kinetics and cellular responses of six N-formyl peptide agonists in human neutrophils

Anna Waller et al. Biochemistry. .

Abstract

The goal of this study was to elucidate the relationships between early ligand binding/receptor processing events and cellular responses for the N-formyl peptide receptor system on human neutrophils as a model of a GPCR system in a physiologically relevant context. Binding kinetics of N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanyl-phenylalanyl-lysine-fluorescein and N-formyl-valyl-leucyl-phenylalanyl-lysine-fluorescein to the N-formyl peptide receptor on human neutrophils were characterized and combined with previously published binding data for four other ligands. Binding was best fit by an interconverting two-receptor state model that included a low affinity receptor state that converted to a high affinity state. Response behaviors elicited at 37 degrees C by the six different agonists for the N-formyl peptide receptor were measured. Dose response curves for oxidant production, actin polymerization, and G-protein activation were obtained for each ligand; whereas all ligands showed equal efficacy for all three responses, the ED(50) values varied as much as 7000-fold. The level of agonism and rank order of potencies of ligands for actin and oxidant responses were the same as for the G-protein activation assay, suggesting that the differences in abilities of ligands to mediate responses were determined upstream of G-protein activation at the level of ligand-receptor interactions. The rate constants governing ligand binding and receptor affinity conversion were ligand-dependent. Analysis of the forward and reverse rate constants governing binding to the proposed signaling receptor state showed that it was of a similar energy for all six ligands, suggesting the hypothesis that ligand efficacy is dictated by the energy state of this ligand-receptor complex. However, the interconverting two-receptor state model was not sufficient to predict response potency, suggesting the presence of receptor states not discriminated by the binding data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources