Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair
- PMID: 15209749
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00382.x
Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair
Abstract
Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, particularly if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Despite the many advances in thoracic surgery, the management of patients with esophageal perforation remains controversial. We performed a retrospective clinical review of 36 patients, 15 women (41.7%) and 21 men (58.3%), treated at our hospital for esophageal perforation between 1989 and 2002. The mean age was 54.3 years (range 7-76 years). Iatrogenic causes were found in 63.9% of perforations, foreign body perforation in 16.7%, traumatic perforation in 13.9% and spontaneous rupture in 5.5%. Perforation occurred in the cervical esophagus in 12 cases, thoracic esophagus in 13 and abdominal esophagus in 11. Pain was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 24 patients (66.7%). Dyspnea was noted in 14 patients (38.9%), fever in 12 (33.3%) and subcutaneous emphysema in 25 (69.4%). Management of esophageal perforation included primary closure in 19 (52.8%), resection in seven (19.4%) and non-surgical therapy in 10 (27.8%). The 30-day mortality was found to be 13.9%, and mean hospital stay was 24.4 days. In the surgically treated group the mortality rate was three of 26 patients (11.5%), and two of 10 patients (20%) in the conservatively managed group. Survival was significantly influenced by a delay of more than 24 h in the initiation of treatment. Primary closure within 24 h resulted in the most favorable outcome. Esophageal perforation is a life threatening condition, and any delay in diagnosis and therapy remains a major contributor to the attendant mortality.
Copyright 2004 ISDE
Similar articles
-
Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience.Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(4):374-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00918.x. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Dis Esophagus. 2009. PMID: 19207557
-
Management of esophageal perforation.Surg Today. 2001;31(1):36-9. doi: 10.1007/s005950170217. Surg Today. 2001. PMID: 11213040
-
Modified T-tube repair of delayed esophageal perforation results in a low mortality rate similar to that seen with acute perforations.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):1129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.012. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17307472
-
[Diagnosis and treatment of cervical esophageal perforation in adults].Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1999 Mar;50(2):142-6. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1999. PMID: 10217689 Review. Spanish.
-
Management of intrathoracic oesophageal perforation: analysis of 16 cases.Trop Doct. 2011 Oct;41(4):201-3. doi: 10.1258/td.2011.110120. Epub 2011 Aug 10. Trop Doct. 2011. PMID: 21831933 Review.
Cited by
-
Delayed presentation of pharyngeal erosion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:173687. doi: 10.1155/2015/173687. Epub 2015 Jan 29. Case Rep Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25699193 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Approach to Esophageal Perforation.Eurasian J Med. 2022 Feb;54(1):100-105. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21135. Eurasian J Med. 2022. PMID: 35307640 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency esophagectomy: Experience of a high volume esophageal cancer center.Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):371-376. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.6613. Pak J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 36950389 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic management for delayed diagnosis of a foreign body penetrating the esophagus into the lung.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):221-2. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.96467. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22626804 Free PMC article.
-
Perforation of esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis following mussel shell ingestion.J Thorac Dis. 2016 Aug;8(8):E693-7. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.07.88. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 27621902 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources