This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 1992 Sep 1;147(5):627-33.

Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination

No authors listed

PMID: 1521208
PMCID: PMC1336384

Review

Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination

No authors listed. CMAJ. 1992.

. 1992 Sep 1;147(5):627-33.

PMID: 1521208
PMCID: PMC1336384

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy.
Huang L. Huang L. J Clin Eng. 1994 Jul-Aug;19(4):297-309. J Clin Eng. 1994. PMID: 10137111 Review.
Routine ultrasound screening.
Gomez KJ, Copel JA. Gomez KJ, et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;6(5):426-9. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 7827272 Review.
[Periodic medical examination. Update 1992. 2. Systematic screening using prenatal ultrasonography. The Canadian Study Group for Periodic Medical Examination].
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Union Med Can. 1993 Jul-Aug;122(4):260-5. Union Med Can. 1993. PMID: 8367915 Review. French. No abstract available.
A clinical and ethical evaluation of routine obstetric ultrasound.
Skupski DW, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Skupski DW, et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;6(5):435-9. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 7827274 Review. No abstract available.
[Routine ultrasound examination during pregnancy--is it really necessary?].
Achiron R, Mashiach S. Achiron R, et al. Harefuah. 1994 Dec 1;127(11):463-5. Harefuah. 1994. PMID: 7806107 Hebrew. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Proliferation of prenatal ultrasonography.
You JJ, Alter DA, Stukel TA, McDonald SD, Laupacis A, Liu Y, Ray JG. You JJ, et al. CMAJ. 2010 Feb 9;182(2):143-51. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090979. Epub 2010 Jan 4. CMAJ. 2010. PMID: 20048009 Free PMC article.
Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: an ultrasonographic marker for adverse fetal and neonatal outcome?
De Oronzo MA. De Oronzo MA. J Prenat Med. 2011 Jan;5(1):9-13. J Prenat Med. 2011. PMID: 22439068 Free PMC article.

References

1. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1987;3(3):463-70 - PubMed
1. Lancet. 1984 Jun 16;1(8390):1347 - PubMed
1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 May;89(5):338-41 - PubMed
1. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;76(2):189-94 - PubMed
1. Lancet. 1988 Sep 10;2(8611):585-8 - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Europe PubMed Central
- PubMed Central
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information