Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun 24;2(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-2-3.

A contingent valuation study to estimate the parental willingness-to-pay for childhood diarrhoea and gender bias among rural households in India

Affiliations

A contingent valuation study to estimate the parental willingness-to-pay for childhood diarrhoea and gender bias among rural households in India

Mo Amin et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

We used contingent valuation technique to estimate the parental willingness to pay for an episode of diarrhoea among 324 children of both sexes aged between five and seven years in two rural villages of Chennai in India. The aim was to examine if there was any gender bias in the parental willingness to treat children for a diarrhoeal episode, and if so to what extent. The willingness to pay was specified as a hedonic function of the duration and severity of an episode, and of parents' socioeconomic characteristics. The findings suggest that parents were willing to pay more to protect their male child compared to the female child suffering from a diarrhoeal episode. The median willingness to pay to avoid an episode for male and female children were calculated at Rs. 33.7 (approx. US$ 0.72) and Rs. 25.2 (approx. US$ 0.54) respectively - a difference of around 34%. After adjusting for the greater duration and severity of the illness, it was found that the difference between the two medians increased to 51%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsuchiya A, Williams A. Welfare economics and economic evaluation. In: Drummond MF, McGuire A, editor. Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 27–28.
    1. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW, editors . Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. pp. 213–215.
    1. Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy. 1999;47:97–123. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00010-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diener A, O'Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ. 1998;7:313–326. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<313::AID-HEC350>3.3.CO;2-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johannesson M. The contingent valuation method – appraising the appraisers. Health Econ. 1993;2:357–359. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources