Similar articles

• Robotic and open radical prostatectomy: is there reason to be receptive to change now and in the future?

  Ghavamian R. Ghavamian R. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Jul;9(7):863-5. doi: 10.1586/era.09.65. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009. PMID: 19589023 No abstract available.
• Editorial comment on: Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.

  Klingler HC. Klingler HC. Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1385. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.012. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19243887 No abstract available.
• Editorial comment on: Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.

  Naspro R. Naspro R. Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1384-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19243885 No abstract available.
• Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state.

  Patel VR, Shah K, Palmer KJ, Thaly R, Coughlin G. Patel VR, et al. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 Sep;7(9):1269-78. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.9.1269. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007. PMID: 17892427 Review.
• Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Part II.

  Salomon L, Sèbe P, De La Taille A, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Yiou R, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Salomon L, et al. BJU Int. 2004 Jul;94(2):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04951.x. BJU Int. 2004. PMID: 15217417 Review. No abstract available.