Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992;230(5):446-50.
doi: 10.1007/BF00175931.

A comparative study of optic nerve head in low- and high-tension glaucomas

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparative study of optic nerve head in low- and high-tension glaucomas

J Yamagami et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992.

Abstract

The disc and rim areas in 15 eyes from 15 selected low-tension glaucoma (LTG) patients were compared with those in 15 eyes from 15 selected high-tension glaucoma (HTG) patients. In all patients, visual field defects (VFD) were at an early stage (mean deviation greater than -5 dB, program 30-2 of Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, STATPAC) and were confined to either the upper or lower hemifield. There were no significant differences in the degree of VFD between LTG and HTG, and the peak intraocular pressure averaged 18.9 and 29.2 mmHg for LTG and HTG eyes, respectively. The disc and rim areas were determined from stereoscopic disc photographs using the method of Littman. The half rim area corresponding to the upper or lower hemifield without VFD was significantly smaller for LTG than HTG (LTG 0.26 +/- 0.08 mm2, HTG 0.31 +/- 0.08 mm2, mean +/- SD, n = 15, P less than 0.005). The rim area corresponding to the upper or lower hemifield with VFD was also significantly smaller for LTG than HTG (LTG 0.19 +/- 0.08 mm2, HTG 0.24 +/- 0.08 mm2, P less than 0.01). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the disc area between LTG and HTG (LTG 1.96 +/- 0.57 mm2, HTG 2.03 +/- 0.45 mm2, P greater than 0.4). It was suggested that the differences in rim area were already present prior to the manifestation of the VFD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;100(7):1074-7 - PubMed
    1. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1975;73:491-553 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Aug;26(8):1105-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Jan 15;105(1):35-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 May;108(5):705-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources