Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jul;27(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.012.

Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network

Robert F Forman  1 , Dace Svikis, Ivan D Montoya, Jack Blaine
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network

Robert F Forman et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Jul.

Abstract

Several instruments for diagnosing substance use disorders (SUD) have been developed, but to date none has emerged as the standard for community-based clinical studies. To select the most suitable SUD diagnostic instrument for its clinical trials, the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) implemented a procedure in which 36 university-based addiction researchers and 62 community-based addiction treatment providers evaluated and ranked five widely recognized diagnostic instruments: (1) the SUD section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID); (2) the SUD section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, 2nd ed. (CIDI-2); (3) the SUD section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV Diagnosis (DIS-IV); (4) the Diagnostic Statistical Manual-IV Checklist (DSM-IV Checklist); and (5) the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS). To assist the evaluation and ranking process, key characteristics of each instrument were presented in tabular and narrative formats. Participants ranked each instrument from 1 (most preferred) to 5 (least preferred). The SCID received the best overall mean score (2.24) followed by the CIDI-2 (2.59), DIS (2.94), DSM Checklist (3.40) and the SDSS (3.83). After discussing the pragmatic and scientific advantages and disadvantages of each instrument, the CTN Steering Committee selected the CIDI-2. The selection of the CIDI-2 standardizes the collection of diagnostic data and provides a common diagnostic tool for practitioners and clinical researchers in the CTN. Implications for practice/research collaboration and initiatives are explored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ranking order means of diagnostic instruments by investigators and community—based CTPs. Contrasts indicated a significant instrument × rater effect for ratings of the SCID relative to the SDSS, F(1,96) = 14.862, p < .0001. N = 62 CTPs, 36 Investigators; 98 Total. 1 = highest ranking, 5 = lowest ranking
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Albanese MJ, Bartel RL, Bruno RF, Morgenbesser MW, Schatzberg AF. Comparison of measures used to determine substance abuse in an inpatient psychiatric population. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994;151:1077–1078. - PubMed
    1. Allen JP, Litten RZ, Anton RF, Cross GM. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin as a measure of immoderate drinking: remaining issues. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. 1994;18:799–812. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: Author; 2000.
    1. Anton RF. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin for detection and monitoring of sustained heavy drinking. What have we learned? Where do we go from here? Alcohol. 2001;25:185–188. - PubMed
    1. Chiang CN, Hawks RL. Implications of drug levels in body fluids: Basic concepts. In: Hawks RL, Chaing CN, editors. Urine testing for drugs of abuse. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1986. (NIDA Research Monograph No. 73,pp. 62– 83)

Publication types