Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004;82(2):283-354.
doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00311.x.

A political history of medicare and prescription drug coverage

Affiliations
Review

A political history of medicare and prescription drug coverage

Thomas R Oliver et al. Milbank Q. 2004.

Abstract

This article examines the history of efforts to add prescription drug coverage to the Medicare program. It identifies several important patterns in policymaking over four decades. First, prescription drug coverage has usually been tied to the fate of broader proposals for Medicare reform. Second, action has been hampered by divided government, federal budget deficits, and ideological conflict between those seeking to expand the traditional Medicare program and those preferring a greater role for private health care companies. Third, the provisions of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 reflect earlier missed opportunities. Policymakers concluded from past episodes that participation in the new program should be voluntary, with Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers sharing the costs. They ignored lessons from past episodes, however, about the need to match expanded benefits with adequate mechanisms for cost containment. Based on several new circumstances in 2003, the article demonstrates why there was a historic opportunity to add a Medicare prescription drug benefit and identify challenges to implementing an effective policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ABC News/Washington Post Poll. 2003. [accessed Dec. 8, 2003]. Poll released on Dec. 8. Available at http://abcnews.go.com/images/pdf/883a37Medicare.pdf.
    1. Abelson R. Narrow Interest in a Broad Measure. New York Times. 2003:C6. Sept. 4.
    1. Abelson R, Freudenheim M. Medicare Compromise Plan Won't Cut Costs, Critics Say. New York Times. 2003:A18. Nov. 18.
    1. Achman L, Gold M. Medicare+Choice Plans Continue to Shift More Costs to Enrollees. New York: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., for the Commonwealth Fund; 2003. Report prepared by. April.
    1. Agan T. Dangerous Interaction: How Mixing a Drug Benefit with Medicare Could Mean an Overdose of Federal Spending. 2003. [accessed March 8, 2004]. National Taxpayers Union Foundation Policy Paper 143, Aug. 26. Available at http://www.ntu.org/main/press_papers.php?PressID=164&org_name=NTUF.

Publication types

MeSH terms