A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance
- PMID: 15225972
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance
Abstract
We present in this paper a picture of the neural systems controlling defense that updates and simplifies Gray's "Neuropsychology of Anxiety". It is based on two behavioural dimensions: 'defensive distance' as defined by the Blanchards and 'defensive direction'. Defensive direction is a categorical dimension with avoidance of threat corresponding to fear and approach to threat corresponding to anxiety. These two psychological dimensions are mapped to underlying neural dimensions. Defensive distance is mapped to neural level, with the shortest defensive distances involving the lowest neural level (periaqueductal grey) and the largest defensive distances the highest neural level (prefrontal cortex). Defensive direction is mapped to separate parallel streams that run across these levels. A significant departure from prior models is the proposal that both fear and anxiety are represented at all levels. The theory is presented in a simplified form that does not incorporate the interactions that must occur between non-adjacent levels of the system. It also requires expansion to include the dimension of escapability of threat. Our current development and these proposed future extensions do not change the core concepts originally proposed by Gray and, we argue, demonstrate their enduring value.
Similar articles
-
Reactions to threat and personality: psychometric differentiation of intensity and direction dimensions of human defensive behaviour.Behav Brain Res. 2006 Apr 25;169(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.027. Epub 2006 Jan 6. Behav Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16406105 Clinical Trial.
-
Differential effects of infralimbic vs. ventromedial orbital PFC lidocaine infusions in CD-1 mice on defensive responding in the mouse defense test battery and rat exposure test.Brain Res. 2004 Sep 10;1020(1-2):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.06.008. Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15312789
-
Nitric oxide involvement and neural substrates of the conditioned and innate fear as evaluated in the T-maze test in rats.Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jun 3;189(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Feb 7. Behav Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18342958
-
Serotonin, the periaqueductal gray and panic.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 May;28(3):239-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.12.004. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004. PMID: 15225969 Review.
-
[Functional heterogeneity of the limbic structures of the brain in organizing feeding and defensive behaviors].Usp Fiziol Nauk. 1985 Jan-Mar;16(1):62-75. Usp Fiziol Nauk. 1985. PMID: 3919509 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Individual differences in behavioural inhibition explain free riding in public good games when punishment is expected but not implemented.Behav Brain Funct. 2013 Jan 10;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-9-3. Behav Brain Funct. 2013. PMID: 23305116 Free PMC article.
-
The rearing environment persistently modulates mouse phenotypes from the molecular to the behavioural level.PLoS Biol. 2022 Oct 21;20(10):e3001837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001837. eCollection 2022 Oct. PLoS Biol. 2022. PMID: 36269766 Free PMC article.
-
Help or flight? Increased threat imminence promotes defensive helping in humans.Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 26;287(1933):20201473. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1473. Epub 2020 Aug 26. Proc Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32842931 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted deletion of Vglut2 expression in the embryonal telencephalon promotes an anxiolytic phenotype of the adult mouse.Ups J Med Sci. 2015;120(3):144-56. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2015.1032454. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Ups J Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 25857802 Free PMC article.
-
Attentional bias to threat is modulated by stimulus content: an fNIRS study.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jan 11;17:1308457. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1308457. eCollection 2023. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38273882 Free PMC article.