Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991;18(4):286-92.

Comparison of acute rejection in sensitized ("domino") and unsensitized donor hearts following heterotopic transplantation

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Comparison of acute rejection in sensitized ("domino") and unsensitized donor hearts following heterotopic transplantation

A Schuetz et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 1991.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Right cervical heart transplantation was performed in 18 mongrel dogs. Three experimental groups (6 dogs in each) were set up. Group I and II dogs received unsensitized donor hearts, while Group III dogs received the potentially sensitized native hearts of Group I and II dogs, following final rejection episodes in those animals. We call the transplantation of a native heart out of a previous recipient "domino" transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of standard triple-drug therapy in all dogs. Groups II and III received, additionally, high-dose steroids during acute rejection episodes. The donor hearts were assessed daily via transmural biventricular biopsy (graded according to Billingham's criteria), and these results were compared with results of daily cytoimmunologic monitoring (n=259 for activation-index), used as a noninvasive method. Supplementally, antimyosin scintigraphy (n=25, heart-to-lung ratio) was employed for rejection diagnosis. The rejection type was determined by calculating T-cell/B-cell ratios with the aid of fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. The invasive data consisted of 587 transmyocardial biopsy results, which were used to establish the rejection kinetics. In the domino grafts of Group III, acute rejection had an earlier onset (an average of 3.2 days) and was permanent, despite repeated cortisonepulse therapy. In contrast, acute rejection followed a biphasic course in Group II (average rejection-free interval, 6.8 days) and was non-uniform in Group I (onset after an average of 5.7 days). Cytoimmunologic monitoring corresponded significantly (p < 0.001) with daily histologic findings in Groups I and II, but not with those in Group III (domino grafts). The T-cell/B-cell ratio increased in Groups I and II (to an average of 3.9), as would be expected during acute cellular rejection. In contrast, the T-cell/B-cell ratio decreased in Group III (to an average of 1.1). The heart-to-lung ratio, as determined by antimyosin scintigraphy, accurately revealed the various stages of acute rejection in all groups (p < 0.001). We conclude that the native heart appears to become sensitized during acute rejection episodes of a heterotopically transplanted heart. Cytoimmunologic monitoring and calculation of T-cell/B-cell ratios support this conclusion. In addition, we conclude that cyto-immunologic monitoring and antimyosin scintigraphy are highly specific and sensitive tools for diagnosis of cellular rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Transplant Proc. 1990 Aug;22(4):1464-5 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 1975 Oct;115(4):982-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1986 Sep;74(3):501-8 - PubMed
    1. J Heart Transplant. 1988 Jul-Aug;7(4):249-53 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Mar;9(3):555-64 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources