Informed consent and 'wrongful birth': the Austrian Supreme Court's approach
- PMID: 1522780
Informed consent and 'wrongful birth': the Austrian Supreme Court's approach
Abstract
This article examines to what extent the Austrian Supreme Court is willing to apply the theory of informed consent and wrongful birth. In the decision at issue the judges came to the conclusion that a physician need not inform about every single risk of medical therapy. With regard to wrongful birth, the court left open for further discussion whether maintenance costs which were caused by a physician's negligent conduct are a matter of compensation.
Similar articles
-
Wilson v. Kuenzi.Wests South West Report. 1988 May 17;751:741-9. Wests South West Report. 1988. PMID: 12041300
-
Goldberg v. Ruskin.North East Rep Second Ser. 1984 Sep 12;471:530-44. North East Rep Second Ser. 1984. PMID: 12041199
-
Hartke v. McKelway.Fed Report. 1983 May 20;707:1544-59. Fed Report. 1983. PMID: 11648480
-
'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue?J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):369-75. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.369. J Med Ethics. 1998. PMID: 9873975 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Austrian cases on medical liability.Eur J Health Law. 2003 Jun;10(2):91-114. doi: 10.1163/092902703769681579. Eur J Health Law. 2003. PMID: 14635455 Review. No abstract available.