After the Master Settlement Agreement: trends in the American tobacco retail environment from 1999 to 2002
- PMID: 15231103
- DOI: 10.1177/1524839904264603
After the Master Settlement Agreement: trends in the American tobacco retail environment from 1999 to 2002
Abstract
Research indicates that one impact of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) may be to increase the focus of the tobacco industry's marketing approach on the retail tobacco environment. This article aims to provide an overview of and trends in the post-MSA American tobacco retail environment from 1999 to 2002, nationally, by region, and by locale. We examined the following specific retail tobacco environment issues: price, promotions, advertising, and placement, which stimulate or reduce demand for tobacco products. Data for this article were obtained as part of the ImpacTeen Project-A Policy Research Partnership to Reduce Youth Substance Use. Results show overall high levels of advertising, promotional activity, and price increase trends across the United States. Tobacco promotions in stores increased between 2001 and 2002. Stores in the south and rural areas tended to have the lowest prices and highest prevalence of promotions and advertising, suggesting a need for tobacco control intervention.
Similar articles
-
How did the Master Settlement Agreement change tobacco industry expenditures for cigarette advertising and promotions?Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):84S-90S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264600. Health Promot Pract. 2004. PMID: 15231101
-
Impacts of the Master Settlement Agreement on the tobacco industry.Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13(4):356-61. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007229. Tob Control. 2004. PMID: 15564618 Free PMC article.
-
Point of purchase cigarette promotions before and after the Master Settlement Agreement: exploring retail scanner data.Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):140-2. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011262. Tob Control. 2006. PMID: 16565464 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the role of cigarette promotion and youth smoking in a changing marketing environment.J Health Commun. 2005 Apr-May;10(3):261-78. doi: 10.1080/10810730590934280. J Health Commun. 2005. PMID: 16036733 Review.
-
Monitoring the tobacco use epidemic IV. The vector: Tobacco industry data sources and recommendations for research and evaluation.Prev Med. 2009 Jan;48(1 Suppl):S24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Oct 11. Prev Med. 2009. PMID: 18976685 Review.
Cited by
-
The Master Settlement Agreement and its impact on tobacco use 10 years later: lessons for physicians about health policy making.Chest. 2010 Mar;137(3):692-700. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0982. Chest. 2010. PMID: 20202950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Smokeless tobacco marketing and sales practices in Appalachian Ohio following federal regulations.Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jul;14(7):880-4. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr243. Epub 2012 Feb 7. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012. PMID: 22318692 Free PMC article.
-
Retail Tobacco Marketing in Rural Versus Nonrural Counties: Product Availability, Discounts, and Prices.Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):27S-36S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919888652. Health Promot Pract. 2020. PMID: 31908200 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco Point-of-Purchase marketing in school neighbourhoods and school smoking prevalence: a descriptive study.Can J Public Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;98(4):265-70. doi: 10.1007/BF03405400. Can J Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17896733 Free PMC article.
-
Storefront cigarette advertising differs by community demographic profile.Am J Health Promot. 2010 Jul-Aug;24(6):e26-31. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090618-QUAN-196. Am J Health Promot. 2010. PMID: 20594091 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources