Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):15-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.15.

Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients

Munir Pirmohamed et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the current burden of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) through a prospective analysis of all admissions to hospital.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Two large general hospitals in Merseyside, England.

Participants: 18 820 patients aged > 16 years admitted over six months and assessed for cause of admission.

Main outcome measures: Prevalence of admissions due to an ADR, length of stay, avoidability, and outcome.

Results: There were 1225 admissions related to an ADR, giving a prevalence of 6.5%, with the ADR directly leading to the admission in 80% of cases. The median bed stay was eight days, accounting for 4% of the hospital bed capacity. The projected annual cost of such admissions to the NHS is 466m pounds sterling (706m Euros, 847m dollars). The overall fatality was 0.15%. Most reactions were either definitely or possibly avoidable. Drugs most commonly implicated in causing these admissions included low dose aspirin, diuretics, warfarin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than aspirin, the most common reaction being gastrointestinal bleeding.

Conclusion: The burden of ADRs on the NHS is high, accounting for considerable morbidity, mortality, and extra costs. Although many of the implicated drugs have proved benefit, measures need to be put into place to reduce the burden of ADRs and thereby further improve the benefit:harm ratio of the drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients—a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998;279: 1200-5. - PubMed
    1. Kvasz M, Allen IE, Gordon MJ, Ro EY, Estok R, Olkin I, et al. Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a critique of a meta-analysis. MedGenMed 2000;2: E3. - PubMed
    1. Wiffen P, Gill M, Edwards J, Moore A. Adverse drug reactions in hospital patients. A systematic review of the prospective and retrospective studies. Bandolier Extra 2002;June: 1-16.
    1. Ghose K. Hospital bed occupancy due to drug-related problems. J R Soc Med 1980;73: 853-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gosney M, Tallis R. Prescription of contraindicated and interacting drugs in elderly patients admitted to hospital. Lancet 1984;ii: 564-7. - PubMed

Publication types