Balancing benefits and harms in public health prevention programmes mandated by governments
- PMID: 15231625
- PMCID: PMC443455
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.41
Balancing benefits and harms in public health prevention programmes mandated by governments
Abstract
Even when scientific evidence for a preventive health intervention is strong, many barriers exist to population-wide implementation
Figures
Comment in
-
Balancing benefits and harms in health care: ethical dimension was not discussed in theme issue.BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):458; discussion 458-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.458. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 15321912 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Oakley GP Jr. Inertia on folic acid fortification: public health malpractice. Teratology 2002;66: 44-54. - PubMed
-
- Johnston RB Jr. Do vaccines cause harm? The need for open-minded analysis based on science and reason. Adv Pediatr 2003;50: 231-44. - PubMed
-
- MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council vitamin study. Lancet 1991;338: 131-7. - PubMed
-
- Czeizel AE, Dudas I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med 1992;327: 1832-5. - PubMed
-
- Raats M, Thorpe L, Hurren C, Elliott K. Changing preconceptions: the HEA folic acid campaign, 1995-1998. London: Health Education Authority. 1998.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources