Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems and future vision
- PMID: 15231856
- DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyh053
Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems and future vision
Abstract
In the 1990s, laparoscopic surgery entirely changed the traditional style of surgical operations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has spread rapidly and is now established as the standard treatment. However, besides cholecystectomy, endoscopic procedures are still not applied so widely to a variety of surgical operations. This is because laparoscopic techniques, such as suturing or ligation, make it difficult for surgeons to perform other kinds of operations and thus greatly increase their mental and physical stress. It is necessary to introduce various advanced technologies such as: surgical robots, three dimensional (3D) images, computer graphics (CG), computer simulation technology and others. Surgical robots, including the AESOP, da Vinci and ZEUS systems, provide surgeons with technologically advanced vision and hand skills. As a result, such systems are expected to revolutionize the field of surgery. However, there have so far been few studies which discuss the indications of robotic surgery for tumors/cancer. Therefore, herein we review various studies published in English to focus on the application of robotic surgery to tumors/cancer. We point out that there are several problems to be solved for robot surgery: i) price of surgical robots, ii) training systems for surgeon, iii) coverage by medical insurance, iv) downsizing and v) navigation system. In conclusion, we believe that, in the near future as robotic technology continues to develop, almost all kinds of endoscopic surgery will be performed by this technology. It will replace traditional surgery not only in the treatment of benign diseases but also in malignant illnesses.
Similar articles
-
Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.Surg Endosc. 2002 Oct;16(10):1389-402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8283-7. Epub 2002 Jul 29. Surg Endosc. 2002. PMID: 12140630 Review.
-
[Robotic surgery].Magy Seb. 2013 Oct;66(5):236-44. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.66.2013.5.2. Magy Seb. 2013. PMID: 24144815 Review. Hungarian.
-
[Laparoscopic surgery and robot].Bull Cancer. 2007 Dec;94(12):1075-80. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2007.0524. Bull Cancer. 2007. PMID: 18156116 Review. French.
-
Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):610-28. Arch Esp Urol. 2002. PMID: 12224160 Review.
-
Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.Can J Urol. 2007 Jun;14(3):3571-6. Can J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17594748
Cited by
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):1039-45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1238-y. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014. PMID: 25366357
-
Robotic Surgery in Oncology.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):549-551. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01251-y. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33299274 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):855-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1281-x. Epub 2010 Aug 24. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20734081 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic splenectomy: what is the real benefit?World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3067-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2697-6. World J Surg. 2014. PMID: 25002249
-
MRI-guided laparoscopic and robotic surgery for malignancies.Int J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr;12(2):94-8. doi: 10.1007/s10147-007-0664-z. Epub 2007 Apr 27. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17443276 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials