Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun:(423):235-9.
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000128648.93615.48.

Efficacy of a new pressure-sensitive alarm for clinical use in orthopaedics

Affiliations

Efficacy of a new pressure-sensitive alarm for clinical use in orthopaedics

Lew C Schon et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

The current study evaluated a new pressure alarm and compared the ability of subjects to limit weightbearing to 20 lb with and without the alarm. The 28 subjects were divided into four groups (Group 1, n = 7, mean age, 33 years, with normal sensation; Group 2, n = 7, mean age, 59 years, with normal sensation; Group 3, n = 6, mean age, 56 years, without protective lower limb sensation, and Group 4, n = 8, mean age, 39 years, with transtibial amputation). All subjects were instructed in partial weightbearing ambulation and then practiced weight shifting onto a scale set at 20 lb for 2 minutes. Average peak force was measured using the F-scan in-shoe sensor while subjects ambulated in two trials: one with a deactivated pressure alarm and the other with an activated alarm. Data were analyzed using two-tailed t tests. In Groups 1, 2, and 4, significantly lower average peak force with the activated alarm versus deactivated alarm occurred in 43%, 86%, and 100% of subjects, respectively. Weightbearing was limited to less than 20 lb with the activated alarm in 86%, 57%, 33%, and 38% of subjects versus 71%, 14%, 0%, and 0% of subjects with the deactivated alarm, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources