Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations
- PMID: 15233584
Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations
Abstract
Background: It has been suggested that the frictional resistance of ceramic brackets can be reduced by either lining the slots with stainless steel or by contouring the base of the slot.
Objectives: The objectives of this investigation were to compare in vitro the static and kinetic frictional resistances of ceramic brackets with metal lined slots ("Clarity", CL), stainless steel brackets ("Miniature Twin", MT), and two ceramic brackets with different slot designs ("Contour", CO; "Transcend", TR).
Method: Two sizes (0.018 x 0.025 inch; 0.021 x 0.025 inch) of stainless steel (SS), nickel titanium (NiTi) and beta titanium (beta-Ti) wires were drawn through the brackets. All brackets had 0.022 inch slots, and the brackets and wires were used once. The brackets were of different widths: CL, 0.180 inch; CO, 0.114 inch; MT, 0.118 inch; TR, 0.138 inch. An Instron Universal Testing Machine was used in this study.
Results: There were no significant static or kinetic frictional differences when the smaller 0.018 x 0.025 inch wires were drawn through the brackets. There were no statistically significant static or kinetic frictional differences between the CL-CO, CL-MT and CO-MT bracket pairs when the 0.021 x 0.025 inch wires (SS, NiTi, beta-Ti) were used. There were no significant kinetic frictional resistance differences between the CL-TR and MT-TR when the SS wires were used. In general the static and kinetic resistances of the 0.021 x 0.025 inch wires of NiTi wire < SS wire < beta-Ti wire. Regardless of wire type some of the lowest kinetic resistances were found with the narrow CO brackets with the rounded slot bases. The highest static and kinetic frictional resistances were found with the wide TR bracket, and with stainless steel and beta-Ti wires.
Conclusion: The high static and kinetic frictional resistances of ceramic brackets can be reduced either by lining the slots with stainless steel or by reducing the bracket width and rounding the slot base.
Similar articles
-
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.Aust Orthod J. 2006 Nov;22(2):147-52. Aust Orthod J. 2006. PMID: 17203579
-
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.Aust Orthod J. 2007 May;23(1):36-40. Aust Orthod J. 2007. PMID: 17679533
-
Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Aug;98(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70005-W. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2378317
-
Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):300-12. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2220691 Review.
-
Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):201-10. doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1. Angle Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19852662 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Frictional resistance of three types of ceramic brackets.J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Jan 1;4(4):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2013.4403. eCollection 2013 Oct. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014. PMID: 24478913 Free PMC article.
-
Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.J Orofac Orthop. 2016 May;77(3):214-23. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0027-3. Epub 2016 Apr 20. J Orofac Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27098639 English.
-
Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1036-44. doi: 10.2319/122810-751.1. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21699367 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical Properties and Potential Clinical Implications of Improved Superelastic Orthodontic Archwires: An Observational Study.Cureus. 2023 Nov 5;15(11):e48334. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48334. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38060728 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires.J Orthod Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):42-6. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.156028. J Orthod Sci. 2015. PMID: 26020037 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous