Cost analysis of secondary prophylaxis with oral clodronate versus pamidronate in metastatic breast cancer patients
- PMID: 15235902
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0659-5
Cost analysis of secondary prophylaxis with oral clodronate versus pamidronate in metastatic breast cancer patients
Abstract
Objective: We compared the direct medical costs of secondary prophylaxis with bisphosphonates (BPs) in bone metastases (BMs) of breast cancer (BCa) from a payer perspective.
Patients and methods: This study adopted an incidence-based chart review of consecutive BCa patients with BMs who received prophylactic treatment with orally administered (po) clodronate (CLODpo group), or intravenously administered (iv) pamidronate (PAM group) in 1997 at two large oncology centers in Toronto, Ontario. We evaluated the difference in costs of management of patients among the CLODpo and PAM groups using an intent-to-treat analysis from diagnosis of BMs to death, or last follow-up. The results are presented as observed mean and average lifetime (including terminal care) costs per patient.
Results: The observed mean costs in the PAM and CLODpo groups were 49,472 dollars and 50,307 dollars (2002 Canadian dollars), respectively. The difference in costs between the CLODpo (n=34) and PAM (n=18) groups was not significant (P=0.64), and remained robust after sensitivity analyses. The corresponding average lifetime costs were 65,677 dollars in the CLODpo group and 61,254 dollars in the PAM group. Inpatient and terminal care were the major cost drivers, comprising 45% and 25% of overall costs. Of all hospitalizations, 46% were associated with complications from BMs.
Conclusions: Our analysis, which was based on a convenience sample, failed to reveal a statistically significant difference in the observed mean costs between groups of patients who initiated treatment with po clodronate versus iv pamidronate. The cost estimates from this study can be used for future corroborative economic analyses.
Similar articles
-
Pamidronate in prevention of bone complications in metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):72-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.72. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10623695
-
Economic evaluation of zoledronic acid versus pamidronate for the prevention of skeletal-related events in metastatic breast cancer and multiple myeloma.Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb;28(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000138966.66780.3e. Am J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15685028
-
Time and labor costs associated with administration of intravenous bisphosphonates for breast or prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone disease: a time and motion study.Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Apr;42(2):38-45. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.04.1102. Hosp Pract (1995). 2014. PMID: 24769783
-
Bisphosphonates for cancer patients: why, how, and when?Support Care Cancer. 2002 Jul;10(5):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s005200100292. Epub 2001 Oct 19. Support Care Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12136223 Review.
-
An evaluation of the potential cost reductions resulting from the use of clodronate in the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the breast to bone.Bone. 1991;12 Suppl 1:S37-42. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(91)90066-r. Bone. 1991. PMID: 1720013 Review.
Cited by
-
Managing Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Feb;172(2):406-418. doi: 10.1002/ohn.990. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025. PMID: 39327863 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Skeletal metastases from breast cancer: pathogenesis of bone tropism and treatment strategy.Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015 Dec;32(8):819-33. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9743-0. Epub 2015 Sep 7. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015. PMID: 26343511 Review.
-
Clodronate : a review of its use in the prevention of bone metastases and the management of skeletal complications associated with bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.Drugs Aging. 2004;21(14):949-62. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421140-00005. Drugs Aging. 2004. PMID: 15554753 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous