Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Jul 5:2:48.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-48.

Trophoblast-uterine interactions at implantation

Affiliations
Review

Trophoblast-uterine interactions at implantation

John D Aplin et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Implantation of the embryo in the uterus is a critical and complex event and its failure is widely considered an impediment to improved success in assisted reproduction. Depending on whether placentation is invasive or superficial (epitheliochorial), the embryo may interact transiently or undergo a prolonged adhesive interaction with the uterine epithelium. Numerous candidate interactions have been identified, and there is good progress on identifying gene networks required for early placentation. However no molecular mechanisms for the epithelial phase are yet firmly established in any species. It is noteworthy that gene ablation in mice has so far failed to identify obligatory initial molecular events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagrammatic representation of the series of interactions between the trophectoderm/trophoblast (TE) and luminal epithelium (LE) and subjacent stroma. Potential roles of cell adhesion molecules at each stage are indicated. 1) Pre-receptive polarised endometrial epithelium with desmosomes distributed along lateral LE cell surfaces and non-adhesive apical cell surface; 2) Receptive endometrium and initial embryo attachment: reorganisation of lateral LE adhesion complexes accompanies apical carbohydrate ligand engagement to tether blastocyst; integrins and cell–bound HB-EGF now become available for TE-binding; 3) Stabilisation of initial attachment by αv or other integrin-mediated adhesion involving bridging ligands shown; other components are also probably functional; 4) Potential signalling through cell adhesion ligand-receptor interaction including calmodulin and calcium.

References

    1. Bergh PA, Navot D. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:537–42. - PubMed
    1. Aplin JD. Implantation. In: Simpson E, editor. Encyclopedia of Hormones. San Diego, Academic Press; 2003. pp. 289–297.
    1. Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F, Minguez Y, Gimenez C, Egozcue J, Remohi J, Simon C. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00143-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quenby S, Vince G, Farquharson R, Aplin J. Recurrent miscarriage: a defect in nature's quality control? Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1959–1963. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.8.1959. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lessey BA. Uterine factors in implantation. In: Glasser SR, Aplin JD, Giudice L, Tabibzadeh S, editor. The Endometrium. London, Taylor and Francis; 2002. pp. 208–228.

LinkOut - more resources